Leica Tri-Elmar 28-35-50mm f4

Started Jan 9, 2012 | Discussions thread
Paul Richman
Paul Richman OP Veteran Member • Posts: 3,455
Thanks again, Dr Rohde...

Dr. Ulrich Rohde wrote:

I did not find it weak, but a detcated 28 or 35 is alsways a good choice if you dont add up buying 28/35 and 50 Leica or Zeiss. Zeiss actually is a goot alternative, the 3 lenses at 2.8 maybe less then 1 TriElmar.

Yes, I agree. I have 4 Zeiss ZF.2 lenses, and have loved working with them. But now I want smaller, lighter, zoom if possible, but with high IQ, not necessarily the absolute highest IQ, but high.

Not easy choices

True. This shift from Nikon to "smaller, lighter" has been rather mind-boggling, but, also, fun. I leave in a month for a two week photography trip in the western US, and want to get all this ready for that trip, which will involve some strenuous hiking, hopefully with a light, high quality, system.

-- hide signature --

Paul Richman
Pixels By Paul

 Paul Richman's gear list:Paul Richman's gear list
Olympus E-M1 II Olympus Zuiko Digital 1.4x Teleconverter EC-14 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm 1:2.8 Macro Leica Nocticron 42.5mm Olympus 40-150mm F2.8 Pro +4 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow