Leica Tri-Elmar 28-35-50mm f4

Started Jan 9, 2012 | Discussions thread
Irakly Shanidze
Irakly Shanidze Veteran Member • Posts: 5,258
Re: Leica Tri-Elmar 28-35-50mm f4

Tri-Elmar is certainly expensive, and Zeiss gives you excellent and relatively low cost options. Most things pro and contra were already said.
I just want to add a couple of points

1. Tri-Elmar is a much higher quality optically than the proposed R-zoom. Also it is undeniably smaller than ANY R-zoom. the only driving force for opting for the 35-70 R is the price.

2. The real advantage of Tri-Elmar versus Zeiss is when you have to work in a dusty environment where unmounting a lens is a bad idea.
Irakly Shanidze

 Irakly Shanidze's gear list:Irakly Shanidze's gear list
Leica M9 Sony Alpha a99 Leica SL (Typ 601) Leica M10 Leica SL 24-90mm F2.8-4 +2 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow