WaltKnapp
Forum Pro
Enough of your bashing and whining. Obviously you hate OVF.Canon, Nikon, Pentax can offer you your dream OVF. Time to switch instead of bashing and whinning.
Walt
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Enough of your bashing and whining. Obviously you hate OVF.Canon, Nikon, Pentax can offer you your dream OVF. Time to switch instead of bashing and whinning.
How could that be? It's only basic physics of light.OMG the EVF is slower then the speed of light!EVF lag is problem for me when shooting action with the A77...
Walt, where are you. You were right after all!.![]()
True, but I believee the A77 is the first camera to have it in this price rangeThe a900 has this, so it's not a unique advantage of the SLT, can be done with OVF
- Micro adjust
In the viewfinder?These have been provided in various OVF SLRs in the past, again, not unique to the SLT
- Horizon level in viewfinder
Cybershots and very expensive DSLRsThere are quieter cameras than SLT, even ones from Sony.
- Less noise (as in sound
)
We started this thread with the OP wanting improvements over A700 and the A77 does have more.But less than in other DSLRs with OVF
- More cross AF sensors
Not unique but by all the reviews I have seen it is the best so farNot unique to SLT by a long ways. Can be done with a OVF DSLR
- Superb tilt screen
Can be, but has not. But again the point is the comparision with the A700And are found in some of Sony's Cybershots among others. Again not a unique feature for SLT, can be done with a OVF DSLR.
- HDR, Pano, 3D Pano, although I prefer the perfect lit shot, these gizmo's do add value
Can't argue that but to me it is an improvementWith a uncalibrated LCD screen! Also uncalibrated EVF! And can't do either with flash, or other mixed lighting. Does not directly show the DOF, and is showing a view with the wide open aperture, not the exposing aperture.
- See what you are really shooting (white balance, exposure etc) before you take the shot
Yes, but it does reflect the possibilities with PPIt's especially funny in that so many claim to only shoot RAW. The EVF is showing you the results of it's jpeg processing, not RAW.
And more expensive, > > - 100% field of view, size comparible to full frameAgain, there have been faster OVF SLRs/DSLRs
- Fast bracketing
To get a 100% viewfinder that is as large as the A900 you need to go with an expensive system or buy a A77.a900 is 100% viewfinder, and it's hardly the only one. Many DSLRs and SLRs have had 100% viewfinders. SLT is not necessary for this.
The OP was asking because he wants to ungrade an A700, A700 does not have live view.Ah, but you can also do this via the rear screen of a DSLR with live view. It works very well, and you keep the option of using an optical finder. You'd get the advantages of an EVF (manual focusing aids, exposure preview for JPGs, flexible information overlay) whenever you want, and the advantages of an optical finder (infinite resolution, no lag, much lower power consumption) whenever you want.Then you can use "peaking" for even better focus control, and loupe view for a magnified view. Works very well handheld, and is excellent for ultra-critical focusing.
--I've been looking for a while but I haven't been able to find anything saying that the a55 and a65 autofocus better than the a580. Theoretically the a55/65 should have an advantage, but I haven't seen any controlled tests (or even anecdotal evidence).With SLT design the autofocus works continious, also when the shutter is open.
Is this really a significant advantage. In a similar time as you could adjust for example exposure, I couid take a quick shot and look on the back, adjust and reshoot.
- Micro adjust
- Horizon level in viewfinder
- Less noise (as in sound
)
- More cross AF sensors
- Superb tilt screen
- HDR, Pano, 3D Pano, although I prefer the perfect lit shot, these gizmo's do add value
- See what you are really shooting (white balance, exposure etc) before you take the shot
Well it is a new camera and better for you in some ways and cost you $1000+ . So you should use it and resell the a700 to someone who will enjoy a great camera.I'm sad to say my a700 has been idle since I got the a77. I should probably sell it.
- Fast bracketing
- 100% field of view, size comparible to full frame
If not, add increased dynamic range and noise performance over your A700, the OLED is a revelation, and if you shoot fast subjects, the 12fps and cross type sensors are amazing.well for one thing with the lack of mirror and electronic first curtain you will get sharper images.
is that enough?
Danel is right, the secondary sensor system used in the A300/350/500/550/560/580 cameras was all phase detection auto focus when it was set to the Quick Auto Focus Live View mode. The A560 and A580 cameras added contrast detect AF on lenses with micro motors, namely just the Sony models.
So you could pan and shoot with the LCD activated in QAFLV mode, with phase detection AF.
One of the reasons why I like the A580 so much, just one of the many
Carl
http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/
"Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude; nothing can help the man with wrong one."
-Thomas Jefferson
D7000 has it. Canon 50D had it before that.True, but I believee the A77 is the first camera to have it in this price rangeThe a900 has this, so it's not a unique advantage of the SLT, can be done with OVF
- Micro adjust
Nikon D7000 has it. It's L/R tilt only (not forward backward) and down in the info portion of the VF (not an overlay) so the SLT implementation is vastly better, but the D7000 implementation is vastly better than not having it at allIn the viewfinder?These have been provided in various OVF SLRs in the past, again, not unique to the SLT
- Horizon level in viewfinder
D7000 is as quiet or quieter than the A55 normally; in 'Q" mode much quieter. I'd be interested to compare it to the A77 (I've tried both cameras but not side by side).Cybershots and very expensive DSLRsThere are quieter cameras than SLT, even ones from Sony.
- Less noise (as in sound
)
But the thread subject asks if there's any photographic advantage to the SLT.We started this thread with the OP wanting improvements over A700 and the A77 does have more.But less than in other DSLRs with OVF
- More cross AF sensors
Your credibility took a dive, not his. Any review ever written always mentions that manual focusing is better with the main sensor lliveview than with using OVF (and A77 is full-time live view camera).I'm sorry, but your credibility really took a dive with this claim as far as I'm concerned.The A77 evf is clearly better for manual focusing than the A700 small and dim ovf.
and you think that filling this forum with your bitterness and hatred towards sony is going to make them change their minds, or serve any other useful purpose? we got the message already - years ago. give it a rest and get on with something constructiveI could care less what camera you prefer. But I care a lot that Sony provide choice for the A mount. That they do not do now.
correct - which means that an ovf is also slower than the "speed of light"How could that be? It's only basic physics of light.OMG the EVF is slower then the speed of light!EVF lag is problem for me when shooting action with the A77...
Walt, where are you. You were right after all!.![]()
![]()
--How is that so? As far as I know the A700 also use phase detection. Manual focusing is probably better with an OVF because of its infinite resolution, whereas EVF is limited by the number of pixels.
- Much better tools for critical manual focusing
- Faster and more reliable autofocus
All Sony's new cameras have a feature called "focus peaking". It can only implemented on EVF. OVF can use split circle prism as a focusing aid, but you have to purchase it separately, from third party manufacturer.it has micro focus adjustment. This has to result in sharewr images with many lens.
--How is that so? As far as I know the A700 also use phase detection. Manual focusing is probably better with an OVF because of its infinite resolution, whereas EVF is limited by the number of pixels.
- Much better tools for critical manual focusing
- Faster and more reliable autofocus
Mike Fewster
Adelaide Australia
The fact that I can see my exposure level in real time (especially in spot metering mode) and the depth of field without dimming the EVF helps a LOT when I'm shooting in a hurry.I'm debating of upgrading from the A700, but so far the advantages of an SLT camera is for video and live view. However, in terms of photography and image quality, is there any?
My point is that his credibility took a dive by calling the A700 viewfinder small and dim - it's not. I'm not addressing manual focusing ability per se.Your credibility took a dive, not his. Any review ever written always mentions that manual focusing is better with the main sensor lliveview than with using OVF (and A77 is full-time live view camera).I'm sorry, but your credibility really took a dive with this claim as far as I'm concerned.The A77 evf is clearly better for manual focusing than the A700 small and dim ovf.
I disagree. I find zooming in and focusing far easier than changing a screen.Dozens of other screen designs are available for OVF. Including ones that will far more precisely help focus than magnification of the pixels of the sensor. And far far faster then fiddling with magnification settings.
--In your description of the A700 OVF as "small and dim" I think you may be confusing it with the Sony Penta Mirror models. You seem a little prone to exaggaration with this and you "slamming mirror" remarks in your other post.
I'm not disputing you basic remarks but these exaggerations don't speak well toward credability.
--
Dave