Any REAL photographic advantage of an SLT?

  • Micro adjust
The a900 has this, so it's not a unique advantage of the SLT, can be done with OVF
True, but I believee the A77 is the first camera to have it in this price range
  • Horizon level in viewfinder
These have been provided in various OVF SLRs in the past, again, not unique to the SLT
In the viewfinder?
  • Less noise (as in sound :) )
There are quieter cameras than SLT, even ones from Sony.
Cybershots and very expensive DSLRs
  • More cross AF sensors
But less than in other DSLRs with OVF
We started this thread with the OP wanting improvements over A700 and the A77 does have more.
  • Superb tilt screen
Not unique to SLT by a long ways. Can be done with a OVF DSLR
Not unique but by all the reviews I have seen it is the best so far
  • HDR, Pano, 3D Pano, although I prefer the perfect lit shot, these gizmo's do add value
And are found in some of Sony's Cybershots among others. Again not a unique feature for SLT, can be done with a OVF DSLR.
Can be, but has not. But again the point is the comparision with the A700
  • See what you are really shooting (white balance, exposure etc) before you take the shot
With a uncalibrated LCD screen! Also uncalibrated EVF! And can't do either with flash, or other mixed lighting. Does not directly show the DOF, and is showing a view with the wide open aperture, not the exposing aperture.
Can't argue that but to me it is an improvement
It's especially funny in that so many claim to only shoot RAW. The EVF is showing you the results of it's jpeg processing, not RAW.
Yes, but it does reflect the possibilities with PP
  • Fast bracketing
Again, there have been faster OVF SLRs/DSLRs
And more expensive, > > - 100% field of view, size comparible to full frame
a900 is 100% viewfinder, and it's hardly the only one. Many DSLRs and SLRs have had 100% viewfinders. SLT is not necessary for this.
To get a 100% viewfinder that is as large as the A900 you need to go with an expensive system or buy a A77.

--
Sarge

A77, A700 8mm Bower, 50mm 1.7, 35-70 F4, 90mm Tamron, 18-250 Sigma & 50-500 Bigma
Fisheye photos at http://sony-snapper.com/Fish-Eye/index.html
Toy - Asus Transformer Android 3.2.1 tablet
Albums at http://www.sony-snapper.com
 
Then you can use "peaking" for even better focus control, and loupe view for a magnified view. Works very well handheld, and is excellent for ultra-critical focusing.
Ah, but you can also do this via the rear screen of a DSLR with live view. It works very well, and you keep the option of using an optical finder. You'd get the advantages of an EVF (manual focusing aids, exposure preview for JPGs, flexible information overlay) whenever you want, and the advantages of an optical finder (infinite resolution, no lag, much lower power consumption) whenever you want.
The OP was asking because he wants to ungrade an A700, A700 does not have live view.
With SLT design the autofocus works continious, also when the shutter is open.
I've been looking for a while but I haven't been able to find anything saying that the a55 and a65 autofocus better than the a580. Theoretically the a55/65 should have an advantage, but I haven't seen any controlled tests (or even anecdotal evidence).
--
Sarge

A77, A700 8mm Bower, 50mm 1.7, 35-70 F4, 90mm Tamron, 18-250 Sigma & 50-500 Bigma
Fisheye photos at http://sony-snapper.com/Fish-Eye/index.html
Toy - Asus Transformer Android 3.2.1 tablet
Albums at http://www.sony-snapper.com
 
  • Micro adjust
  • Horizon level in viewfinder
  • Less noise (as in sound :) )
  • More cross AF sensors
  • Superb tilt screen
  • HDR, Pano, 3D Pano, although I prefer the perfect lit shot, these gizmo's do add value
  • See what you are really shooting (white balance, exposure etc) before you take the shot
Is this really a significant advantage. In a similar time as you could adjust for example exposure, I couid take a quick shot and look on the back, adjust and reshoot.
  • Fast bracketing
  • 100% field of view, size comparible to full frame
I'm sad to say my a700 has been idle since I got the a77. I should probably sell it.
Well it is a new camera and better for you in some ways and cost you $1000+ . So you should use it and resell the a700 to someone who will enjoy a great camera.

Trace
 
Danel is right, the secondary sensor system used in the A300/350/500/550/560/580 cameras was all phase detection auto focus when it was set to the Quick Auto Focus Live View mode. The A560 and A580 cameras added contrast detect AF on lenses with micro motors, namely just the Sony models.

So you could pan and shoot with the LCD activated in QAFLV mode, with phase detection AF.

One of the reasons why I like the A580 so much, just one of the many

Carl

http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/

"Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude; nothing can help the man with wrong one."
-Thomas Jefferson
 
One of the practical purposes of having an SLT vs. OVF is that you actually see what the sensor sees, not what you see. You can actually see the grain when you try to point it at a really dark area. You can also see how the picture is going ot be exposed based on the subject/AF point being used. You want to see how exposure compensation is going to affect shadows/highlights? You can actually see this happen in real time as you dial in the amounts of compensation. I actually think EVF is better in low light compared to OVF, because it actually acts like a semi nightvision (you can actually see something) whereas OVF you are limited on high good your eyesight is. And in very dark scenes, human eyesight is just not that good.

The next thing Sony needs to do is work around this slide show effect when you shoot high fps, or even have an EVF that doesnt black out at all during exposure.
 
well for one thing with the lack of mirror and electronic first curtain you will get sharper images.
is that enough?
If not, add increased dynamic range and noise performance over your A700, the OLED is a revelation, and if you shoot fast subjects, the 12fps and cross type sensors are amazing.
 
you're right, I was speaking in general live view tech from other companies and not specifically the A580. I realized it afterwards when I looked up the A580 but didn't want to post a follow up until someone caught it. thanks
Danel is right, the secondary sensor system used in the A300/350/500/550/560/580 cameras was all phase detection auto focus when it was set to the Quick Auto Focus Live View mode. The A560 and A580 cameras added contrast detect AF on lenses with micro motors, namely just the Sony models.

So you could pan and shoot with the LCD activated in QAFLV mode, with phase detection AF.

One of the reasons why I like the A580 so much, just one of the many

Carl

http://photographic-central.blogspot.com/

"Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude; nothing can help the man with wrong one."
-Thomas Jefferson
 
  • Micro adjust
The a900 has this, so it's not a unique advantage of the SLT, can be done with OVF
True, but I believee the A77 is the first camera to have it in this price range
D7000 has it. Canon 50D had it before that.
  • Horizon level in viewfinder
These have been provided in various OVF SLRs in the past, again, not unique to the SLT
In the viewfinder?
Nikon D7000 has it. It's L/R tilt only (not forward backward) and down in the info portion of the VF (not an overlay) so the SLT implementation is vastly better, but the D7000 implementation is vastly better than not having it at all :)
  • Less noise (as in sound :) )
There are quieter cameras than SLT, even ones from Sony.
Cybershots and very expensive DSLRs
D7000 is as quiet or quieter than the A55 normally; in 'Q" mode much quieter. I'd be interested to compare it to the A77 (I've tried both cameras but not side by side).
  • More cross AF sensors
But less than in other DSLRs with OVF
We started this thread with the OP wanting improvements over A700 and the A77 does have more.
But the thread subject asks if there's any photographic advantage to the SLT.

The advantages of SLT versus SLR are superior LV & video with PDAF, responsive shutter w/front electronic curtain, no mirror vibration.
  • Dennis
--
Gallery at http://kingofthebeasts.smugmug.com
 
The A77 evf is clearly better for manual focusing than the A700 small and dim ovf.
I'm sorry, but your credibility really took a dive with this claim as far as I'm concerned.
Your credibility took a dive, not his. Any review ever written always mentions that manual focusing is better with the main sensor lliveview than with using OVF (and A77 is full-time live view camera).
 
I could care less what camera you prefer. But I care a lot that Sony provide choice for the A mount. That they do not do now.
and you think that filling this forum with your bitterness and hatred towards sony is going to make them change their minds, or serve any other useful purpose? we got the message already - years ago. give it a rest and get on with something constructive

--
i know what i know, which is a fraction of what i don't
 
it has micro focus adjustment. This has to result in sharewr images with many lens.
  • Much better tools for critical manual focusing
  • Faster and more reliable autofocus
How is that so? As far as I know the A700 also use phase detection. Manual focusing is probably better with an OVF because of its infinite resolution, whereas EVF is limited by the number of pixels.
--
Mike Fewster
Adelaide Australia
 
it has micro focus adjustment. This has to result in sharewr images with many lens.
  • Much better tools for critical manual focusing
  • Faster and more reliable autofocus
How is that so? As far as I know the A700 also use phase detection. Manual focusing is probably better with an OVF because of its infinite resolution, whereas EVF is limited by the number of pixels.
--
Mike Fewster
Adelaide Australia
All Sony's new cameras have a feature called "focus peaking". It can only implemented on EVF. OVF can use split circle prism as a focusing aid, but you have to purchase it separately, from third party manufacturer.
 
I'm debating of upgrading from the A700, but so far the advantages of an SLT camera is for video and live view. However, in terms of photography and image quality, is there any?
The fact that I can see my exposure level in real time (especially in spot metering mode) and the depth of field without dimming the EVF helps a LOT when I'm shooting in a hurry.

Of secondary importance is the time I save doing panoramic shots. Sony did a really good shot with the in-camera image processing engine.

DB
 
The A77 evf is clearly better for manual focusing than the A700 small and dim ovf.
I'm sorry, but your credibility really took a dive with this claim as far as I'm concerned.
Your credibility took a dive, not his. Any review ever written always mentions that manual focusing is better with the main sensor lliveview than with using OVF (and A77 is full-time live view camera).
My point is that his credibility took a dive by calling the A700 viewfinder small and dim - it's not. I'm not addressing manual focusing ability per se.

--
Barry
 
compared to the A77 the A700's vf is in fact small and dim. fact is fact
In your description of the A700 OVF as "small and dim" I think you may be confusing it with the Sony Penta Mirror models. You seem a little prone to exaggaration with this and you "slamming mirror" remarks in your other post.

I'm not disputing you basic remarks but these exaggerations don't speak well toward credability.
--
Dave
--
http://www.fotosource.com/downloads/flyer/eye_cancer_en_CA.pdf
 
Apparently with focus peaking on the new SLT cameras fast and precise focusing is possible with the A65 & 77 cameras. I can't confirm since I've never used a camera that has that feature. I don't ever expect you to admit that an EVF could have any advantages at all since you're too stubborn for that but I can assure you that a well designed EVF does have some practical advantages. That said, for the time being OVF's have some advantages too.
--
Tom

Look at the picture, not the pixels

http://www.flickr.com/photos/63683676@N07/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/25301400@N00/
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top