Focal Distance and DX vs FX
I've been admiring the work of Lee Jeffries and noticed that many of his very tight portraits are shot with a 24mm lens (others at 85mm) on a Canon 5D. I set up a 16mm lens on my Nikon D7000 and using a test subject "filled the frame" with a tight head shot. The 16mm focal length should be roughly equivalent to the 24mm on a FX body.
I was surprised at just how close the lens was to my subject, less than 12 inches from lens to face to get the tight head shot that Lee gets.
I assume that the focal plane to subject distance would be the same for a 24mm on a FX body. Am I wrong?
I'm just very surprised that the camera is that close to the subject at that focal length. Is that typical?
I know that the shots could be cropped too. It's just seems to be a strange focal length for such tight portraits. Wouldn't it be easier to achieve with say a 85mm equivalent lens from a greater distance?
Can anyone with portrait experience comment on this?
|Aurora Borealis by Gary Blake|
from Aurora Borrealis
|Graceful Oversight by Kwajtrader|
from A Big Year - birds
|Ride by rajeev22675|
from - BRICS Series 03 : Family Time- in Brazil / Russia / India / China / South Africa (Full Colours Only)