Fash Primes For Portraits

Started Dec 9, 2011 | Discussions thread
mystic-bright Regular Member • Posts: 215
Re: back to show off your gear?

Faintandfuzzy wrote:

mystic-bright wrote:

Simon Stanmore wrote:

Wow ... These posts read like completely unedited streams of mixed-up conciousness

you are probably right. problem is .. this room is full of photographers, it's not that easy to spread BS about portraits shot at 1.4 or 1.2 in regular basis expecting to get away with it


what I see is the usual show-off of the gear and bad advise just to say the opposite of what others are saying. The OP moved a very reasonable question about the use of a fast prime wide open for a portrait when 2.8 is already more then enough and you get all sort of "people" jumping in saying otherwise , and just because. The truth is that everybody knows how a portrait at 1.2 or 1.4 looks like (and usually a portrait involves heads, with eyes and hair) and a DOF so short to make almost impossible to select the target to get in focus and getting it in the actual shot.

The have no problem with it either. They are also "real" photographers. It seems the problem is limited to you.

not really, look closer. also look at this thread, closer too.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow