Why no Olympus m43 body without IBIS?

Started Nov 29, 2011 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
bluevellet Senior Member • Posts: 2,332
Why no Olympus m43 body without IBIS?

I know people will argue Olympus includes IBIS to compensate for their lenses without OIS, but if you look at their older 4/3 bodies, there was always small, low-cost bodies without IBIS, despite the similar con with their 4/3 lenses. So why is it different now with m4/3?

There's clearly a drive to make m4/3 cameras smaller and drive down cost, IBIS is an obstacle with that goal.

The only reason I can see is because of Panasonic, they're more involved with m4/3 than they ever were with 4/3, they're a direct competitor and IBIS seem to serve as a marketing ploy to differentiate Olympus cameras from Panasonic's and keep people from buying Panasonic lenses with OIS if they already have IBIS in Olympus camera bodies.

 bluevellet's gear list:bluevellet's gear list
Nikon D600 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 Olympus E-M5 II Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75mm F1.8 Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art +13 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow