DxO blows or I do ?
Let's start with their new idiotic comparometer. The old one was so simple to use. The new one is just stupid, it takes sooooooooooooooooooo many more clicks and effort to compare cameras.
Anyway, I have another problem with them. They say the Canon S90 is 21% better at low-light than the newer S95. I have the S90 by the way.
Now look and compare RAW files from both cameras at dpreview or whatever website you like. The S95 is clearly better at high ISO. Not by much, but it is clearly better.
How do you explain that according to DxO the S90 is 21% better at high sensitivity than the S95, but the RAW files show it's the other way around, which make the DxO error greater than 21%
DxO sucks ?
I suck ?
Sample variations between sensors ?
don't worry you don't suck there have been some discussions on this forum on correlation of DxOmark score and picture output. And those seem to be not quite correlated:) http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1033&message=37677188
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%