Who need Nikon F1 When there is NEX and Micro 4/3

Started Sep 21, 2011 | Discussions thread
Joele Veteran Member • Posts: 4,633
agree 100% (n/t)

zxaar wrote:

sandy b wrote:

Even if it does not sell as well as Nikon would like, (and I don't believe that for a min), it will still out sell Oly's line up. The biggest reason? With the Nikon I can put my 180 2.8 on it, or my 18-200 vr, or my 40 macro. Just a few of the hundreds of useable combo's that will keep Nikon buyers at home.

One has to be utter dumb to spend money on this just to use his dSLRs lenses on it when he can use them well on his dSLRs.

I understand the tele advantage and macro advantage of smaller sensor but that advantage is much more with pentax Q (crop factor of 5.7) than Nikon 1. Again you have to be absolutely stupid to buy this for these two advantages while you can do better with Q.

-- hide signature --

Joel - Olympus E-P3, 9-18, 14-42 R II, 50/2, 150/2, Panasonic 14/2.5, 25/1.4 Voigtlander 75/2.5

My Gallery: http://www.eisner.id.au

 Joele's gear list:Joele's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic Lumix G Vario 7-14mm F4 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G 14mm F2.5 ASPH Panasonic Leica Summilux DG 25mm F1.4 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow