Warning! Drool and spit!

J A K

Forum Pro
Messages
15,701
Reaction score
10
Location
US
Hi Everyone:

Well, after reading Lumiar351's comments about noise, focus, and lens cap test problems, I was VERY concerned about posting this picture of my youngest granddaughter. When I came home from work, I was surprised to find her at our house and playing in a Walker. Today, she took her first steps in the Walker (and of course, I was there to take a picture).

Please excuse any artifacts in the picture that don't meet with your immediate approval. I promise to get this $#@? 7i camera fixed. Tomorrow I'm going to take my lens cap to a camera repair shop for a tune-up; hopefully, this will fix the d@mn lens cap test problem and allow me to focus my camera a little better in the future.

All kidding aside, I hope you enjoy the picture as much as I did taking it.

Sincerely,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia

 
You had me there for a minute, I scanned that picture, and for the life of me, I couldn't figure out what the heck you were talking about. And then I found the post you referred to. Good one. For some reason, I must have gotten a "good one" because I don't have any of the issues he spoke of regarding the 7Hi.
Hi Everyone:

Well, after reading Lumiar351's comments about noise, focus, and
lens cap test problems, I was VERY concerned about posting this
picture of my youngest granddaughter. When I came home from work,
I was surprised to find her at our house and playing in a Walker.
Today, she took her first steps in the Walker (and of course, I was
there to take a picture).

Please excuse any artifacts in the picture that don't meet with
your immediate approval. I promise to get this $#@? 7i camera
fixed. Tomorrow I'm going to take my lens cap to a camera repair
shop for a tune-up; hopefully, this will fix the d@mn lens cap test
problem and allow me to focus my camera a little better in the
future.

All kidding aside, I hope you enjoy the picture as much as I did
taking it.

Sincerely,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia

 
You had me there for a minute, I scanned that picture, and for the
life of me, I couldn't figure out what the heck you were talking
about. And then I found the post you referred to. Good one. For
some reason, I must have gotten a "good one" because I don't have
any of the issues he spoke of regarding the 7Hi.
Hi Brivers:

Sorry about the confusion. I read a few posts and could not stop laughing after reading about the "lens cap test" failure and the subsequent return for a refund. I'm glad you like your camera - have fun with it and be sure to post some of your favorite pictures.

Sincerely,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia
 
Hi Joe!

I'm thinking of buying a camera and was trying to decide between a D1s, a 7i, or sticking with film and going for a Brownie instamatic.

When I saw your post I was cconcerned to see that it looks as though the Minolta's cause a drooling problem. Is this an artifact, or would I always see it, for instance when I take a photo of my friend Anna Kournikova?
Could you send me a 1000% crop of the mouth area so that I can check it out?

I personally don't think much of a camera that allows this sort of thing to happen.
P.S. Beautiful model though.
--
DaveMart
 
Hi Joe!
I'm thinking of buying a camera and was trying to decide between a
D1s, a 7i, or sticking with film and going for a Brownie instamatic.
When I saw your post I was cconcerned to see that it looks as
though the Minolta's cause a drooling problem. Is this an artifact,
or would I always see it, for instance when I take a photo of my
friend Anna Kournikova?
Could you send me a 1000% crop of the mouth area so that I can
check it out?
I personally don't think much of a camera that allows this sort of
thing to happen.
P.S. Beautiful model though.
--
DaveMart
well, thats made me feel a lot better, see ekim in the lumiar 351 thread, I though I bought a bum camera LOL
You certainly have to have your witts about you on this forum... Great Stuff
Best Regards
Mike
 
Joe,

Just a fantastic shot. She is beautiful. Given that, being board certified in pediatrics, I will avoid a lecture on the walker issue. I'm going to miss your pics and wisdom once I sell my 7i (its a great camera, just in for a change).

From my experience, I think the 7i actually performs better in a drooly (sp?)environment!

Take care,
Ashok
http://www.pbase.com/ashokrai
there will be a lot of male forum members visiting you for dinner.
What dish will you be serving?

Regards,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia
 
...Please excuse any artifacts in the picture that don't meet with
your immediate approval. ....
Meet's my instant approval, as a fellow grand-parent!
Thanks for sharing her with us (those beautiful eyes)
& for the humor. Bob
 
Joe,
Just a fantastic shot. She is beautiful. Given that, being board
certified in pediatrics, I will avoid a lecture on the walker
issue. I'm going to miss your pics and wisdom once I sell my 7i
(its a great camera, just in for a change).
From my experience, I think the 7i actually performs better in a
drooly (sp?)environment!
Hi Ashok:

Thanks for the compliment on my granddaughter - I appreciate the kind words.

Sounds like there is something I should learn about "Walkers" - what is the low down?

So what camera are you thinking about? If it is an SLR type, be warned of the weight and complexity associated with the change of lenses. I'm down to one F1 and an EF (used to have a second F1). Time was when I would put on the three most likely lenses I would be using (plus take the others) and carry about 50 pounds of camera gear around (the additional weight of a 30 pound tripod was yet another item). These days, unless I'm really interested in getting film shots, I just walk out of the house with a small camera bag and the 7i (haven't been happier). For around the house, the one (in fact, only) camera I would consider today would be the 1D and the new lens Canon just came out with (24-70mm L-series). I've tested three 1Ds so far; they all performed great (extremely fast focus acquisition and tracking). Unfortunately, I have not tested the new lens yet. This new Canon setup would be great for grandchildren pictures (sons and daughters in your case); the young children as SO quick. However, even if I had the 1D, I would not consider taking it on a trip - simply too much weight. IMO, the 7i is a killer camera for general photography and especially, vacations. Anyway, I would be interested in what your camera thoughts are.

Regards,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia
 
Meet's my instant approval, as a fellow grand-parent!
Thanks for sharing her with us (those beautiful eyes)
& for the humor. Bob
Hi Bob:

Isn't the grand-parent thing just the greatest? Thanks for the compliment on her eyes (every once in a while I get a wink from her).

Regards,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia
 
Joe,

After debating now for a month, I'm buying an S2. Its more an investment in glass for me. I'm shooting more and more portraits these days, and I want to start to do more in natural light (weddings). The SLR class seems better for my purposes there (using f1.4 would be nice). I also have a growing opportunity to do some sports photography (kid sports). I know a 1D/1Ds/D1x would be better for this, but the wife isn't thrilled with that body expense. I'm moving over to the DSLR line, hopefully to start a nice glass selection (I'm hoping that in 1-2 years, the sports cameras will have a foveon/modified CMOS that is affordable). I'm keeping my CP995 for snap shots (still a great camera). The 7i is a fantastic camera. I'm going to miss the form factor. I fully understand that the photographer, not the camera, make the picture. Hopefully I'm not making a big (expensive) mistake here. I'm going to miss that 7i (once I find someone to buy it).

Ashok

ps here's the low down on walkers. I hate them. I've taken care of way to many injuries associated with walkers (down the stairs, etc). Even in one story houses I find them to be a problem. They do have one big advantage: it can slow down a child long enough for a great picture (yes, my wife used to use a stationary type walker for this purpose!). Take care, and watch out for that drool! (I have lost many a tie to this dreaded enemy).
Joe,
Just a fantastic shot. She is beautiful. Given that, being board
certified in pediatrics, I will avoid a lecture on the walker
issue. I'm going to miss your pics and wisdom once I sell my 7i
(its a great camera, just in for a change).
From my experience, I think the 7i actually performs better in a
drooly (sp?)environment!
Hi Ashok:

Thanks for the compliment on my granddaughter - I appreciate the
kind words.

Sounds like there is something I should learn about "Walkers" -
what is the low down?

So what camera are you thinking about? If it is an SLR type, be
warned of the weight and complexity associated with the change of
lenses. I'm down to one F1 and an EF (used to have a second F1).
Time was when I would put on the three most likely lenses I would
be using (plus take the others) and carry about 50 pounds of camera
gear around (the additional weight of a 30 pound tripod was yet
another item). These days, unless I'm really interested in getting
film shots, I just walk out of the house with a small camera bag
and the 7i (haven't been happier). For around the house, the one
(in fact, only) camera I would consider today would be the 1D and
the new lens Canon just came out with (24-70mm L-series). I've
tested three 1Ds so far; they all performed great (extremely fast
focus acquisition and tracking). Unfortunately, I have not tested
the new lens yet. This new Canon setup would be great for
grandchildren pictures (sons and daughters in your case); the young
children as SO quick. However, even if I had the 1D, I would not
consider taking it on a trip - simply too much weight. IMO, the 7i
is a killer camera for general photography and especially,
vacations. Anyway, I would be interested in what your camera
thoughts are.

Regards,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia
 
Hi Joe!
I'm thinking of buying a camera and was trying to decide between a
D1s, a 7i, or sticking with film and going for a Brownie instamatic.
When I saw your post I was cconcerned to see that it looks as
though the Minolta's cause a drooling problem. Is this an artifact,
or would I always see it, for instance when I take a photo of my
friend Anna Kournikova?
Could you send me a 1000% crop of the mouth area so that I can
check it out?
I personally don't think much of a camera that allows this sort of
thing to happen.
P.S. Beautiful model though.
--
DaveMart
Doesn't look like you guys are prepared to answer THE ISSUE. When I take 'glamour' shots of my friend Anna I drool! Is this due to my use of the D7?????Am I holding it in the right way?
When is Phil going to cover this in his reviews????

I never had this problem when I was taking pictures of Fred with my Polaroid instamatic, and BTW, does the Minolta need more post -processing than my polaroid, and if so, why????
--
DaveMart
 
Another future tuba player! The drool is a definate prerequisite...
Hi Everyone:

Well, after reading Lumiar351's comments about noise, focus, and
lens cap test problems, I was VERY concerned about posting this
picture of my youngest granddaughter. When I came home from work,
I was surprised to find her at our house and playing in a Walker.
Today, she took her first steps in the Walker (and of course, I was
there to take a picture).

Please excuse any artifacts in the picture that don't meet with
your immediate approval. I promise to get this $#@? 7i camera
fixed. Tomorrow I'm going to take my lens cap to a camera repair
shop for a tune-up; hopefully, this will fix the d@mn lens cap test
problem and allow me to focus my camera a little better in the
future.

All kidding aside, I hope you enjoy the picture as much as I did
taking it.

Sincerely,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia

--

Mirafone S186-B, Cleveland Musical Instrument B-flat Sousaphone, USALINE Grand Rapids Instrument Company Silver E-flat, Yamaha YEP-642, Bach 42-B w/Sterling Bell and F-trigger, DEG flueglehorn, Holton cornet w/shepherd's crook... oh, and a few cameras.
 
I like the humor, but not the baby...
Hi Everyone:

Well, after reading Lumiar351's comments about noise, focus, and
lens cap test problems, I was VERY concerned about posting this
picture of my youngest granddaughter. When I came home from work,
I was surprised to find her at our house and playing in a Walker.
Today, she took her first steps in the Walker (and of course, I was
there to take a picture).

Please excuse any artifacts in the picture that don't meet with
your immediate approval. I promise to get this $#@? 7i camera
fixed. Tomorrow I'm going to take my lens cap to a camera repair
shop for a tune-up; hopefully, this will fix the d@mn lens cap test
problem and allow me to focus my camera a little better in the
future.

All kidding aside, I hope you enjoy the picture as much as I did
taking it.

Sincerely,

Joe Kurkjian, Pbase Supporter

http://www.pbase.com/jkurkjia

 
I see that Lumiar351 has a better sense of humor than I do. It seems that some don't understand the rationale of the lenscap test or take seriously the real AF problems it appears to represent. With my warped sense of humor I find it funnier that some think it's OK that a $1000 camera gives AF confirmation with the lenscap on than that some are upset by this.

Without reading the minds of those who came up with the lenscap test, I've assumed that the point was to remove the possibility of user error, e.g. camera shake, subjects with conflicting focus points, etc. That's a perfectly reasonable idea.

Most people report no AF locks with the lenscap on and no false AF locks in normal shooting. As far as I know, no one who has had AF problems in normal use and who has tried the lenscap test has failed to get AF locks with the cap on. Add to this the correlation reported by Charlibob between the results of the lenscap test and AF performance in typical use before and after repair, combined with the "common sense" rationale of the test, and it seems to me there is a strong prima facie case for the usefulness of the test.

However, of the few who report AF locks with cap on, it appears that there are some who don't see any problems with AF in normal use, though most are rather vague about this. Given what has been reported so far, it seems likely to me that the test does correlate at least weakly with AF performance in normal shooting, and more strongly as one reaches the limits of the AF system's abilities -- some who reported AF locks in the lenscap test reported false AF confirmation only in low light or low contrast settings, whereas those without false lenscap results reported no such problems. This and the fact that most people cannot get the AF to lock at all with the cap on suggests fairly strongly that it isn't normal and that it does reflect some kind of problem, at least at the margins of performance, and sometimes in more usual settings. To dismiss the test with ridicule is certainly premature in view of the information we have right now.

Obviously the lenscap test shouldn't be the final arbiter, and in Lumiar's case it wasn't. He reported that the AF also failed to function properly in normal shooting. Highly amusing.
 
Hi Joe,

sorry, i deleted your text and picture. looks extra beautiful. I mean your daughter(great job), the picture is extra bad - how did you dare to put a spell on the camera which took all the noise out of picture! shame on you to disappoint our t-friend number 351?!
Just a little bit of lughter.
AK

p.s. t, i think, stands for troll
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top