IS versus aperture in low light

Started Aug 16, 2011 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
KatManDEW Senior Member • Posts: 1,896
IS versus aperture in low light

I see lots of folks talking about wanting/needing something like the 24-70 f/2.8L for low light shooting. But since that lens doesn't have IS, wouldn't the 24-105 f/4L be better for handheld shooting in low light, since it has three stop IS? If f/2.8 is desired for bokeh, or higer shutter speeds, f/2.8 is understandable. But for low light, handheld, isn't the three stop IS more valuable than one stop of aperture?

 KatManDEW's gear list:KatManDEW's gear list
Canon EOS 300D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EOS 5DS R +16 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow