All this talk about "equivalence" is silly

Started Jun 10, 2011 | Discussions thread
Howard
OP Howard Senior Member • Posts: 1,855
Re: All this talk about "equivalence" is silly

I can't agree more!

carlk wrote:

The weakest part of the “theory” is, in order to make the theory stand, we need to assume the fixed 1.6x noise/ISO difference between FF and aps-c. This is hardly true when you look at dslr from different generations or even dslr of the same generation from different vendors. I know the author understand this even though he sometimes try not to mention it, but most people who quote the theory do not. It becomes another source of confusion and reason for the conflict in the cases you mentioned in your op.

-- hide signature --

cameras: 5D, 50D, D60, R2K
lenses: 17-40 f/4, 24-105 f/4, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6
24 f/3.5 TSE, 35 f/2, 50 f/1.4, Tamron 90 f/2.8 Macro
http://www.imagereservoir.com

 Howard's gear list:Howard's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Sony a6000 Canon EOS 7D Mark II Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Guv
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow