E-PL2 beats X100

Started May 11, 2011 | Discussions thread
Hen3ry Forum Pro • Posts: 18,218
Look at the JPEG sizes; check RAW images

I don't have a dog in this fight, but I would suggest comparing the JPEG sizes. The Oly ones are two-thirds bigger, suggesting that the X100 images from a bigger sensor have been squashed down quite a bit more with resultant quality loss.

So I would suggest that a real comparison should be between RAW files.

Having said that, I am attracted to the notion of the first respondent's E-P1 with the 17 (or Panny 14) lens and matching accessory viewfinder. Very expensive, though. I wouldn't give you tuppence for the E-P1 without an accessory viewfinder; its LCD isn't up to much.

Cheers, geoff
Geoffrey Heard


 Hen3ry's gear list:Hen3ry's gear list
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Panasonic G85 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm F1.8 Panasonic Lumix G X Vario PZ 45-175mm F4.0-5.6 ASPH OIS +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow