If shooting at f/22, is a fast 1.8 lens still considered fast?

Started Apr 17, 2011 | Discussions thread
Windancer Veteran Member • Posts: 5,477
Re: If shooting at f/22, is a fast 1.8 lens still considered fast?

Leonard Shepherd wrote:

Maximum available image quality falls at f22 but can still be good. f16 usually has better image quality - and can be better than f2 or f2.8

I would agree with Leonard's statement. Personally I find F16 is sharper than F22 as an exmple, on my Nikkor 105/2.8 Micro. I usually use that lens at F16. I believe this is due to some refraction of light in the lens. Please, if there is someone more knowledgeable, correct me if I am wrong.

OTOH, I can certainly appreciate Kev's views on using F22 and having a great DofF. As was already pointed out his photography is different than the average photogaper. Great shots Kev!

The point I was trying to make is a lens might be a weeee bit sharper at F16 rather than F22.

Graham Fine Art Photography
See my profile for all my equipment.

Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended to impart a sense of humor. Given e-mail's inability to carry inflections, tone and facial expressions it may fail miserably in its intent. The sender acknowledges the limitations of the technology and assigns to the software in which this message was composed any ill feelings that may arise.

 Windancer's gear list:Windancer's gear list
Nikon D70 Nikon D100 Nikon D200 Nikon D300 Nikon D700 +21 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow