Pick your Prime setup... if you had to pick one of these travel Kits

  1. 1
DA 15mm, DA 40mm, DA 70mm, 100mm Macro WR
  1. 2
DA 15mm, 43mm Limited, 77mm Limited
  1. 3
DA 15mm, Pentax FA 50mm 1.4, DA 70mm, 100mm WR
My most used travel setup on Pentax DSLRs is composed of the Pentax DA 15/4, Pentax DA 35/2.8 Ltd, Voigtländer 58/1.4 and Voigtländer 90/3.5.

I consider the 15-90 range to be ideal for 99% of my shooting needs. The focal lengths are almost ideally spread across the range (15 - 35 - 58 - 90).

These four lenses are able to deliver top notch image quality in almost every possible shooting situation.

Obviously, the DA 15 is king for those wide American vistas, but also for most of my work in the narrow city streets of Europa and the crowded marketplaces of Asia. It's also great for interiors, churches, etc.

The DA 35 is my walk about lens. It offers "normal" field of view, great for street shooting, casual "contextual" portraits, museum shooting, with the added bonus of 1:1 macro for all these tiny details. Ideally, it should be a bit shorter in focal length, but there are no other lenses in that focal range that are so versatile...

The 58/1.4 is a great portrait lens, offering the same angle of view as a 85mm lens on full frame 35mm. It's also very fast, making it suitable for concerts and performances, as well as available light shooting for all kind of social occasions in dimly lit settings.

The 90/3.5 is one of my most used lenses, equivalent to a 135mm telephoto on full frame 35mm. I use it for shooting distant people, architectural details, landscapes with perspective compression, wildlife, etc. As a bonus, it focuses down to 0.5m (1:3.6 magnification) and to 0.32m (1:1.8 mag.) with the close-up add-on lens, allowing me to shoot flowers, sea shells or insects without having to knee on the ground.

A few years ago, I was using the FA 20/2.8 as my wide lens. It's easily as sharp as the DA, but has a few issues (purple fringing) that made me prefer the Limited lens. The 15mm is also obviously wider, but not too wide either (unlike a 8-12mm lens, which is much more a specialist lens).

I also have the Sigma 24/1.8, the FA 35/2 and the DA 40/2.8 Ltd. The Sigma is a very good lens optically speaking, has an ideal focal length and an useful close-up feature, but it's really huge, especially with its giant lens shade (which is mandatory since the lens flares badly when the sun is next to the frame). I am not too fond of the FA 35, because I find its rendering to be a bit "dull". The DA 40, although excellent on all accounts, is a bit too long as a "normal" lens for my taste.

I have tried to replace the Voigtländer 58 with the FA 77 Ltd, but I didnt't like it much. IMHO, 58mm is a more usefull focal length for portraiture on a crop format camera. The 58 is also more versatile, as the 77 has much more purple fringing and longitudinal chromatic aberration, making it more difficult to use, especially for concert and performances with high contrast lighting. On the contrary, the FA 50/1.4 is a bit short for a portrait lens and I prefer the rendering of the 58/1.4.

Of course, if I have some spare room in the bag, I may add the F*300/4.5 or the DA 10-17/3.5-5.6, depending of the subjects I expect to encounter. But the four above lenses go with me everywhere I go. I usually have the DA 35 mounted on the camera in my right hand, with the strap around my wirst; the three other lenses are in a small waist pouch. The whole kit is about 1kg (212g for the DA 15, 215g for the DA 35, 320g for the 58/1.4 and 320g for the 90/3.5), making it quite lightweight, even when I have to carry it to the top of some remote Indonesian volcano...

Cheers!

Abbazz
--
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource: http://artbig.com/

 
I never tire of this kind of thread. IMO, the ideal prime kit would be:
14mm 2.8, 28mm 2.0, 55mm 1.4 and 135mm 2.8 macro (add a 300mm f4 for wildlife).

For practical purposes, I bought the 15mm f4 instead of the 14mm, due to size and optical characteristics.

I use several normals, depending on what I'm doing; Kiron 28mm f2 for its perfect normal focal length, FA 35mm 2.0 for all-round performance, DA 40mm 2.8 for its size. My favourite of these is the FA 35, but I'd really rather have a DA*28mm 2.0. Obviously the FA 31mm would be a reasonable choice for the normal range, but size and cost are significant issues.

The DA*55mm is a beautiful lens, but I already had the FA 50mm when the DA* was released. I love the FA 50 for size and rendering, so it will do.

Pentax doesn't offer a 135mm macro. I have the D FA 100mm 2.8 (again, had it before the WR version was released, not worth trading up). The 100mm is a little bit short compared to my optimum 135mm tele macro, but it doubles as a long portrait lens and has superb IQ, so it's a fine choice.

To sum up, my ideal focal range for a set of prime lenses is extra wide, normal, portrait and telemacro. There are lots of available and practical choices within these parameters. Mostly I carry three lenses though, extra wide, normal and telemacro.

--
Dan
 
I travel with just the 15 and the 70, and don't need anything else! Almost everything on my website has been made with these two lenses.

Admittedly, I do sometimes use the WR kitzoom when it rains :)
Kevin, you have some excellent work on your website! I especially like your post-processing, the color is very appealing without being overdone. However, your navigation links are really dark and hard to read. I have the 15 and the 70, I just might try running with those 2 primes and see how it works out. Thanks for the inspiration!

--
http://www.pixelstatic.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelstatic/
 
2 DA 15mm, 43mm Limited, 77mm Limited
I guess I would try this (having none of them :)) My prime kit is the DA*300mm and the DA 35mm F2.8 Macro Limited
--

 
I keep forgetting the DA * 55 1/4... I really liked that focal length for portraits and also a more personal feeling to general photography. I had an old 55 1/8 SMC that I used on my DS, but I found focusing with it too slow and challenging with that long throw focus ring. Whenever I think of the new SDM 55 1/4 I sort of get all starry eyed. Maybe I'll look into that VL 58... thanks!
--
Lipo
 
I travel with just the 15 and the 70, and don't need anything else! Almost everything on my website has been made with these two lenses.

Admittedly, I do sometimes use the WR kitzoom when it rains :)
Kevin, you have some excellent work on your website! I especially like your post-processing, the color is very appealing without being overdone. However, your navigation links are really dark and hard to read. I have the 15 and the 70, I just might try running with those 2 primes and see how it works out. Thanks for the inspiration!

--
http://www.pixelstatic.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelstatic/
Thanks for the compliment. I do sometimes get the comment that my website is too dark. Though on all the screens I've viewed it on it hasn't been a problem. Perhaps I'll end up changing the text to white.

Have fun with the two prime kit, it simplifies things when you only have 2 choices to go with. People think more choices equals better. But in in photography, as it is in all things in life, it's just not like that.

--
http://www.kevinschoenmakers.nl
 
Well after reading everything here.. I finally made up my mind. \
I added the FA 35mm, and the 77MM Limited both new from B&H

So my travel kit will be:

15mm Limited
35mm FA
50mm FA
77mm Limited
135mm SMC-A

Thanks for everyone's input.

I will probably add a 21mm, and 43mm within the next year so I can really zero down on what works best for me. Thanks for all of the great suggestions.
 
Post some pics!
 
I will, lenses are on their way, should be here Wednesday. And my long overdue two week vacation to Utah/Colorado starts in 2.5 weeks. Counting the days!!!
 
No macro? Are you getting rid of the 100mm, or just not carrying it in your kit?
--
Dan
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top