Tack sharp 16-85mm (6 high res photos)

Started Feb 14, 2011 | Discussions thread
Patco Forum Pro • Posts: 13,687

zzzzzzzzzzz wrote:

Nice images, but I would not use these samples to say a 16-85 is optically superior than an 18-55VR, 18-105VR, or an 18-200VR. All of these lenses are pretty close in IQ.

A voice of reason.

When viewing or printing at normal magnification or size, the photos from all these slow consumer zooms will be more or less the same, and one would be hard-pressed to see any meaningful difference.
The 17-55mm f/2.8 might be another matter, though

-- hide signature --

A photograph is more than a bunch of pixels

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow