Where is E-3 & E-5 comparison?
Am I just blind or what? Regarding comparison pages, has DPR overlooked the differences between an E-5 and E-3, something that I'd have considered a main objective in a review? I mean the review's comparison drop list shows a bundle of cameras other than an E-3, some or most of which may have a rather weak relevance to the E-5 or Fourthirds user. Fine but I would have thought the E-3 to be the most important comparison of all.
E-5 vs: E-3 was what I'd hoped to see in the review. Alas! No, it's back to the dog track.
The most I could see was the "new and old" spec chart or their conclusive opinion that an E-5 is worth my money... if I'm already a Fourthirds user. Too bad I can't see that point made with their comparable test shots and charts today.
|Mig-17-1 by bbmach|
from Low Pass
|Rotting Gracefully by Mond|
from Natural Decay
|attic by wgjohnston|
from In the attic, or in the basement!
|Ox Bow Aspen by McFrost|
from cell phones - nature photographs