Where is E-3 & E-5 comparison?
Am I just blind or what? Regarding comparison pages, has DPR overlooked the differences between an E-5 and E-3, something that I'd have considered a main objective in a review? I mean the review's comparison drop list shows a bundle of cameras other than an E-3, some or most of which may have a rather weak relevance to the E-5 or Fourthirds user. Fine but I would have thought the E-3 to be the most important comparison of all.
E-5 vs: E-3 was what I'd hoped to see in the review. Alas! No, it's back to the dog track.
The most I could see was the "new and old" spec chart or their conclusive opinion that an E-5 is worth my money... if I'm already a Fourthirds user. Too bad I can't see that point made with their comparable test shots and charts today.
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4