Broken "rules" that still work

Started Jan 3, 2011 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Angry-pixel Contributing Member • Posts: 697
Broken "rules" that still work

This is a follow-on from a thread about an image that had blown out highlights, but still worked in the eyes of some, but clearly not others.

This thread is for everyone to have the chance to give an example of where a rule was broken, but you think it still works. In my entry (seen below), I relish flouting the rule that a portrait subjects face must be showing and consider that it still works regardless of the fact that there isn't a face in sight, although that's just my opinion...come on guys, lets have some anarchy....post an image where you're giving the finger to the rule book...LOL...

ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
eNo
eNo
eNo
eNo
eNo
eNo
eNo
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow