Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So how would I make it so that just the flower is in focus? Or do I have do some PP it to correct it? Thats the largest Aperture that Lens goes to so DOF can't be shallower unless I move back and then crop? I'm not sure I understand DOF. I thought DOF would more of a circle or oval around the focus point as opposed to the distance of the entire image.They are in focus because that's the distance where the lens/camera was focused to, and, the foreground and background areas are "out of focus" because those are outside the Depth of Field created by the selection of distance and fStop
Or... someone used photoshop to blur the areas appearing to be out of focus
The lens focusses sharply on a flat plane at a specified distance. The depth of field gives the plane a bit of depth, rather than being paper-thin.So how would I make it so that just the flower is in focus? Or do I have do some PP it to correct it? Thats the largest Aperture that Lens goes to so DOF can't be shallower unless I move back and then crop? I'm not sure I understand DOF. I thought DOF would more of a circle or oval around the focus point as opposed to the distance of the entire image.They are in focus because that's the distance where the lens/camera was focused to, and, the foreground and background areas are "out of focus" because those are outside the Depth of Field created by the selection of distance and fStop
Or... someone used photoshop to blur the areas appearing to be out of focus
Thanks. Other than those ares being in focused is there anything else you can comment on the photo (it is mine). I've only had my D90 for two weeks so any constructive criticism is welcome.The lens focusses sharply on a flat plane at a specified distance. The depth of field gives the plane a bit of depth, rather than being paper-thin.So how would I make it so that just the flower is in focus? Or do I have do some PP it to correct it? Thats the largest Aperture that Lens goes to so DOF can't be shallower unless I move back and then crop? I'm not sure I understand DOF. I thought DOF would more of a circle or oval around the focus point as opposed to the distance of the entire image.They are in focus because that's the distance where the lens/camera was focused to, and, the foreground and background areas are "out of focus" because those are outside the Depth of Field created by the selection of distance and fStop
Or... someone used photoshop to blur the areas appearing to be out of focus
In the sample photo, the sharp parts are where that flat plane intersects the subject.
If you want the flower in focus but not the surroundings, the easiest solution is to arrange the subject so that nothing else in the frame is at the same distance as the flower. If that's not possible (as in the sample), PP is probably the answer.
Regards,
Peter
I'm currently reading Understanding Exposure (I have some other books I'm going to be reading as well) by Bryan Peterson but he doesn't mention anything about DOF being plane. I've skim through the D90 manuel I guess I'll read it more in depth. Thank you for your in-dept explanation.Do yourself a favor -- read a basic book about photography or just the beginner guides provided on this website or others. Heck, the D90 manual should have some basic photography instruction in it.
Your camera focuses on a plane that is parallel to the sensor in your camera. The depth of field (DOF) is how deep or thick that plane is. Everything in that plane will be in focus though depending on the sharpness of your lens at both the center and periphery, the center portion may seem more in focus than the periphery. You use the autofocus or manual focus to fix the plane on which you will be focusing. Unless the flower is in a plane with nothing else in it, there is no way (without post processing) to have just the flower in focus. For example, a shot of a blossom shot from below or level with the blossom in the air with just sky or background also showing. Since your flower is inside something that shows in the shot, portions of that something else will be in the focal plane.
Moreover, you will need to stop down (use a higher numbered aperture) if you want to increase the depth of field and get more than a portion of the flower itself in focus. Shooting at 2.8 gives you a fairly thin DOF, which you can see from the areas you have circled.
--
Raymond R
I've never used Picasa. Would you recommend Picasa over Aperture (not sure if you can do soft focus in this, still have a lot to learn in this program) or Photoshop? (I know my way around photoshop) They only problem I have in Photoshop is it a bit tedious to get the exact spots that are in focus and to get the blur to match.Picasa has a very simple soft focus effect. You can control the amount of blur and the size of the (circular) out of focus area. The original for this was totally in focus.
Thanks. Yes, I'm really enjoying the book, I can tell its a lot of its is over my head but I've been writing down questions to ask (now I can just look it up first on the learn tab) I'll definitely look into the "Learn Tab".Peterson is great! Love his books. But you need to start even more basic than that at first. Try all of the items on the Learn tab at the top of any page on this site. For example, here is the explanation of depth of field:
http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Glossary/Optical/Depth_of_Field_01.htm
Good luck and have fun. the D90 is a great camera.
--
Raymond R
Picasa is a free, simple, web-based editor for total beginners. Aperture is a DAM program, with some global editing capabilities...quite similar to Lightroom. Photoshop is the 800-pound gorilla in the room...it can do anything. To compare Picasa to these other programs is wrong headed.I've never used Picasa. Would you recommend Picasa over Aperture (not sure if you can do soft focus in this, still have a lot to learn in this program) or Photoshop?Picasa has a very simple soft focus effect. You can control the amount of blur and the size of the (circular) out of focus area. The original for this was totally in focus.
Somehow, I doubt that you "know your way around Photoshop". You may need a simpler editor? Try Photoshop Elements 9?(I know my way around photoshop) They only problem I have in Photoshop is it a bit tedious to get the exact spots that are in focus and to get the blur to match.
Well I've used Photoshop for a few years. so I have a good base understanding of how to use it. I've never heard or used Picasa. I didn't know it was free. Thanks tho.Somehow, I doubt that you "know your way around Photoshop". You may need a simpler editor? Try Photoshop Elements(I know my way around photoshop) They only problem I have in Photoshop is it a bit tedious to get the exact spots that are in focus and to get the blur to match.
Yeah, I can't decide whether I'm too cheap, too lazy, or both to get into photoshop. Picasa's great for a quick fix. As you can see from the photo I didn't do a super precise job of isolating on that light. I could probably save that, then go back and do a series of blurs, saving each time, till I got where I wanted. It's nowhere as precise as PS but for $0....Well I've used Photoshop for a few years. so I have a good base understanding of how to use it. I've never heard or used Picasa. I didn't know it was free. Thanks tho.Somehow, I doubt that you "know your way around Photoshop". You may need a simpler editor? Try Photoshop Elements(I know my way around photoshop) They only problem I have in Photoshop is it a bit tedious to get the exact spots that are in focus and to get the blur to match.
Bad choice of words. What I was trying to say is that it's married to several web-based services. I'm a Google fan, but you can bet they have a profit motive in Picasa.@chuxter: Not sure what you mean by "web-based editor." True I can upload photos directly to a free web album (free up to 1 Gb, I think). My editing is off line...but you dload the program from Google.
Ah, ok. IIRC now there is some other service it will offer to direct you to for on-line editing as well but I just use Picasa.Bad choice of words. What I was trying to say is that it's married to several web-based services. I'm a Google fan, but you can bet they have a profit motive in Picasa.@chuxter: Not sure what you mean by "web-based editor." True I can upload photos directly to a free web album (free up to 1 Gb, I think). My editing is off line...but you dload the program from Google.
--
Charlie Davis
Nikon 5700, Sony R1, Nikon D50, Nikon D300
HomePage: http://www.1derful.info
"If ever a time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin."
-Samuel Adams, 1776