Nikon 55-200 vs. Nikon 55-300

Started Nov 11, 2010 | Discussions thread
RussellG Contributing Member • Posts: 509
Re: Nikon 55-200 vs. Nikon 55-300

I have found the 55-300 to be as sharp as my old 70-300 VR lens. It's certainly lighter but well built for its class. It's a bit more solid than the 55-200 and with a metal mount.

Focus speed is about the same as the 55-200. It has VR II as opposed to VR I in the 55-200, but it seems to take just a tad longer to kick in when compared to the 55-200. I don't find this a problem however. It does a very good job at 300mm.

Images are nice and contrasty. I'm pleased with the colours and sharpness.

I would say this lens is perhaps a tad better than the 55-200 which is a good thing since the 55-200 is no slouch.

The bokeh is nice like the 55-200 so I will use it for portraits. I really liked the 55-200, but, for not much more size and weight, you get an extra 100mm with slightly better IQ.

If you need a bit more focusing performance, I'd go with the 70-300 VR.

I would say that if you like the 55-200 but want a bit more reach, then you'll probably enjoy this lens (and save a bit of money too).

-- hide signature --

Kind Regards,


 RussellG's gear list:RussellG's gear list
Panasonic G85 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25mm F1.8 Olympus 14-150 F4-5.6 II Panasonic 12-60mm F3.5-5.6 OIS FastStone Image Viewer +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow