Nikon 55-200 vs. Nikon 55-300
I have found the 55-300 to be as sharp as my old 70-300 VR lens. It's certainly lighter but well built for its class. It's a bit more solid than the 55-200 and with a metal mount.
Focus speed is about the same as the 55-200. It has VR II as opposed to VR I in the 55-200, but it seems to take just a tad longer to kick in when compared to the 55-200. I don't find this a problem however. It does a very good job at 300mm.
Images are nice and contrasty. I'm pleased with the colours and sharpness.
I would say this lens is perhaps a tad better than the 55-200 which is a good thing since the 55-200 is no slouch.
The bokeh is nice like the 55-200 so I will use it for portraits. I really liked the 55-200, but, for not much more size and weight, you get an extra 100mm with slightly better IQ.
If you need a bit more focusing performance, I'd go with the 70-300 VR.
I would say that if you like the 55-200 but want a bit more reach, then you'll probably enjoy this lens (and save a bit of money too).
- Canon EOS M58.8%
- Panasonic G85/G803.3%
- Panasonic FZ2500/FZ20001.9%
- Panasonic LX10/LX151.2%
- Panasonic GH5 development3.6%
- Sony a99 II15.9%
- Nikon KeyMission 170 and 801.0%
- Fujifilm GFX 50S development28.3%
- Olympus E-M1 II development18.7%
- Olympus E-PL80.1%
- Olympus 25mm F1.2 Pro1.5%
- Olympus 12-100mm F4 IS Pro1.9%
- Olympus 30mm F3.5 Macro0.1%
- Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art3.6%
- Sigma 12-24mm F4 Art2.6%
- Sigma 500mm F4 DG OS HSM Sport2.4%
- YI M12.2%
- GoPro Hero50.8%
- GoPro Karma drone2.2%
|Sunflower Field by GrannyMeg|
from An impressionist piece
|Flag from Staten Island Ferry by wam7|
|Windswept juniper by Kreber|
from Wind power
|SAND SCULPTURE by duskman|
from Landscape - Black and White #4