Sigma 17-50 OS HSM vs Nikon 16-85

Started Aug 10, 2010 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Hackzaw Regular Member • Posts: 129
Sigma 17-50 OS HSM vs Nikon 16-85

I'm debating between the Sigma 2.8 17-50 OS HSM vs Nikon 16-85. I hear rave reviews about the Nikon 16-85 for what it is. Of course it, variable aperature and a little slow on the long end. But it's a got more range on both the wide and long end.

I've really been holding out to see if the Sigma 17-50 2.8 is any good. I can't say for sure I NEED 2.8, but it would be handy if required. The Nikon is a tad cheaper. Which way would you go?

 Hackzaw's gear list:Hackzaw's gear list
Nikon D300 Nikon D750 Fujifilm X-T2 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm F1.8G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +5 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow