Actual LX5 vs LX3 ISO 1600 comparison. I prefer LX3 result.

Started Jul 21, 2010 | Discussions thread
OP Condor Senior Member • Posts: 1,768
Re: Actual LX5 vs LX3 ISO 1600 comparison. I prefer LX3 result.

Condor wrote:

Good ISO 1600 side-by-side comparison at the Spanish site "quesabesde" (Note: LX5 is supposed to be a pre-production unit):

In this case I prefer LX3 result. LX5 picture looks softer. LX3 picture looks more real, detailed and more deep. Compare the boat's windows reflection, boat's crew, distant boats behind main boat, etc. ... Every detail is in fact better in LX3 photo

Ed

The following (pre-production) LX5 photo demonstrates that "reddish" colors are more probably associated with the sky-color when that LX3 was taken, than to a "reddish" tendency of LX3 vs. LX5.

But, again, if you look at the details, this LX5 shows to be very soft or unsharped. Check the building's windows especially on both sides of the sample.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/realityscans/4814935252/sizes/o/in/photostream/

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow