Actual LX5 vs LX3 ISO 1600 comparison. I prefer LX3 result.

Started Jul 21, 2010 | Discussions thread
tarnumf Senior Member • Posts: 1,688
Re: Actual LX5 vs LX3 ISO 1600 comparison. I prefer LX3 result.

Condor wrote:

I'm not also one of those freaks who spent working or family time post-processing their RAW photos as they were going to be published in Times, National Geographic or other important magazine, who in fact should just buy and use DSLRs and not be professionally interested in compact cameras. Compact cameras are for normal street people who just take and enjoy their personal photos, and LX3 sample is more enjoyable.

Why so much hatred about post-processing?

People who are into it don't spend much time because they tend to be quite critical about their shots and process just 10-20-50 best picks out of many that were made. And family and friends appreciate good pictures too.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow