Actual LX5 vs LX3 ISO 1600 comparison. I prefer LX3 result.

Started Jul 21, 2010 | Discussions thread
sjprg
sjprg Senior Member • Posts: 1,884
Re: Actual LX5 vs LX3 ISO 1600 comparison. I prefer LX3 result.

If you bring up the images in Photoshop to 300% and use a program called FocusMagic they clearly shows motion blur. These were obviosly taken hand held in low light. Both cameras show the same motion blur. You are beating the subject to death. Until these cameras are put on a tripod for such shots the comparisons are useless other than which color you prefer. Way too many people take motion blur for out of focus.
--
Paul
http://www.pbase.com/sjprg
http://www.sjprg.us

 sjprg's gear list:sjprg's gear list
Sony RX100 V Sony RX100 VII Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Nikon D800E Canon EOS M +13 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow