Sigma 50-150 2.8 EX vs 70-200 4L no-is

Started May 11, 2010 | Discussions thread
Joe Photo Lover Veteran Member • Posts: 3,040
Re: Sigma 50-150 2.8 EX vs 70-200 4L no-is

marc1990 wrote:
Thanks for your advice. I almost 100% sure, just couple questions:

Joe Photo Lover wrote:

If you can find a good copy, the Sigma 50-150 f2.8 can do things that the Canon 70-200mm cannot and vice versa.

How do I find good copy? Is bad copy front or back focus or just soft?


Some posters have complained about both but more so the focus. I own and have owned several Sigma lenses but have not experienced these problems. i do have one Sigma which is a bit softer on one side than the other but the problem did not manifest itself (or at least I didn't notice it) until I owned the lens awhile.

You get a good copy by buying from a reputable dealer with a reasonable return policy and than use the lens quite a bit as soon as you get it to see if it meets your expectations. Buying in store and testing sample shots on a laptop can be helpful if the option is available to you.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow