"Wedding Photography looks easy enough"....

Started Feb 2, 2010 | Discussions thread
Smudger79 Contributing Member • Posts: 933
Re: "Wedding Photography looks easy enough"....

Photo Scholar wrote:

I don't shoot weddings... but if I did.

I would ask the bride to consider how long she plans to married, 50 years or 5years.

If she is planning on throwing away the photos in 5 years it might be smart to go with the cheapest photog you can find. If you want to capture the moment and have photos that you will cherish for a lifetime you might want to research your photographer and find out what makes him think he/she is a professional. Just because someone owns a camera, even a very nice very expensive one, that doesn't make them a professional photographer.

You get what you pay for.

Very true.

Although it doesn't mean that you can't get photos to cherish for the rest of your life from a £500 tog.

If the bride and groom are happy with the standard of the photographs from the cheap photographer, then why bother spending the extra £2500?

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow