50-200 or 55-300 ?

Started Dec 9, 2009 | Discussions thread
trtt Regular Member • Posts: 148
Re: 50-200 or 55-300 ?

Frederick Stewart wrote:

I must add that a good copy of the 50-200 is a champ,due to its small size and fast focus.

I second that. A good copy of the 50-200 will be more usable because this little lens always finds it's place in the bag. And 50-200 is just the lens to be coupled with good primes. Get 21 for wide, 35 for normal/macro and the 50-200 for the occasional tele shot. Makes a very versatile and leightweight set in your bag.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow