70-200VRII vs VRI quick test; I'm baffled!!

Started Dec 2, 2009 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
rb4u2c Regular Member • Posts: 124
70-200VRII vs VRI quick test; I'm baffled!!

I just received my VRII and did some quick tripod/remote release portrait style sharpness testing using my D700 @ 200mm @ f2.8 & f5.6. Raw 2 jpeg. What has shocked me most about the new lens is the difference in the focal length actual view between the two lenses. To achieve the same compostion with the new lens, I had to move in a whole 2ft closer to the subject, but guess what, the lens would not focus whatsoever. I made several shots for verification. To sum it up, MY VRII is definitely sharper at 2.8 than MY VRI. Even though the VRI is "zoomed in" closer to the subject, it still couldn't achieve the sharpness of my VRII. They both seem to focus at the same speed, VRII has better contrast/less flare.... I feel somewhat cheated though, knowing that the VRII won't be giving me the reach that the VRI gave and it costs a whole lot more. Head shots might be a challenge for portrait shooters without having to crop. Please note that all distances are approximate!

All crops taken at 66" away using both lenses:

 rb4u2c's gear list:rb4u2c's gear list
Nikon D750 Nikon D850 Nikon Z7 Nikon Z6 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8G ED +11 more
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow