What about a 70-200 SAM?

Started Aug 29, 2009 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
007peter
007peter Forum Pro • Posts: 10,482
need "Real" USM/HSM to move Heavy Glass elements

redsim74 wrote:

Could a SAM motor even shift the weight of glass in a 70-200/2.8 type lens?

redsim74 raise a Great Question. It is okay to used SAM motor on small & lightweight glass elements, but SAM would also labor harshly "trying" to move heavy glass elements = more miss shot. The end result of a 70-200 f/2.8 SAM would probably be equal or slower than a screw-drive Tamron 70-200 f/2.8.

Canon is also rather cheap in its implementation of USM motor in its standard zoom. But canon always uses real USM motor in its Telephoto/Super-Telephoto lens because USM offer the instant TORQUE required to moves these heavy glass elements.

 007peter's gear list:007peter's gear list
Canon EOS 550D Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 15mm F1.7 ASPH Panasonic Lumix G 25mm F1.7 ASPH
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow