Your recommendation: Single lens

Started Aug 24, 2009 | Discussions thread
OP photosen Veteran Member • Posts: 5,923
Re: Your recommendation: Single lens

Panda9 wrote:

I like primes myself (going back to my OM days) and own four of them, but I see mastering a prime lens as actually harder than mastering a zoom lens. It is also not for everyone. Some people will claim that zooms make people lazy -- I counter that zooms give you freedom from one more dimension, allowing you to concentrate on other aspects of taking a photo. For someone trying to find their own way, reducing the number of variables will speed up the process. Let them learn the basics, then graduate to the more difficult subjects later.

It's all well and good to say, "zoom with your feet," but in practice a beginner will have his/her hands full just trying to get the basic settings right. Subtle composition and perspective decisions are advanced topics. In other words, most beginners won't "zoom with their feet," they'll just stand there and take the photo, since they have not learned how to compose properly. To use a prime well, you have to see things in your mind's eye and move yourself to the proper position to take a shot. A photographer needs experience taking and studying thousands of photos before that "mind's eye" is developed to where they can make it happen with a prime.

Okay - I'm ready for the counter-arguments to flood in. Nothing like discussing primes to stir up the blood.

No counter argument from me, that makes sense... Depends on each person.

This depends on what kind of trip it is. When I take a car trip, I travel with full gear, including my Bigma and three bodies. When travelling by plane, I will usually reduce that kit down to the basics of the E-30 or E-3 with 9-18, 12-60, and 50-200 plus teleconverters. If I'm travelling by foot, I may reduce it further to the E-620, kit lenses and maybe 70-300. In some cases, I may reduce it down to my superzoom (amusement parks, for example).

This is why, even if he were to get the 12-60 or 14-54, it's useful to have both kit lenses. There are times when the kit lenses simply are the best tools for the situation. As they say, the best camera for taking photos is the one you have with you. If the situation calls for small and light and it's a choice between the kit lenses or nothing, guess what?

Another good point for the kit lenses and Olympus...

However, if you've already set up a parameter of $1500 as the budget, then that later will simply be whenever he/she decides which direction he wants to go. You don't have to travel to another country to get this gear - your own country should have it. I was just suggesting that if he happens to be travelling to Asia, he could defer buying the rest of his kit until then. Presumably by that time he will have learned more about his own shooting habits.

Buying lenses in Asia sounds good, and one particular friend is actually planning on going there; that said, it's really no fun paying two or three times the price compared to other countries (The US in particular, and I'm not exagerating).

This is another reason to own both kit lenses to start, as opposed to just the 12-60 or 14-54. If after shooting 2,000 shots he goes back and sees that most of his shooting was done at 14mm and he wishes he had a wider lens, then that would certainly point to upgrading to either/or 12-60, 9-18, or 11-22. If he finds himself using the 40-150 more and thinking he likes telephoto shooting, he could upgrade to the 70-300 or 50-200 (the latter is not that expensive if you get the "old" non-SWD version used).

If he starts out only with a standard zoom (14-54 or 12-60), he won't really find these things out, will he.

Perhaps you just don't have the right P&S. The high end "photographer's" P&S like the Canon G11, Panasonic LX3, or similar offerings are close to dSLRs in image quality, controls, and low-light capability. I have a Panasonic Superzoom which doesn't come close to these other P&S, but within its limits, it serves a purpose within my framework of shooting styles.

I sure don't... But I have yet to handle a P&S I do like... Not much point now, for me at least... I'm not married to the idea of a DSLR for others though...

When I suggested your friend might decide to revert to a P&S, I was referring to these high-end, "almost dSLR" types. You'd be surprised at how good they have become.

I love the 50mm f/2 (I own one and sing it's praises), but I wouldn't get it as my third lens after the kit lenses. I would still recommend that if your friend wants wide, get the 9-18, if he wants long, get the 70-300, or if he's happy with the range and wants to improve the lens speed and IQ, get the 12-60 AFTER the kit lenses. The 50mm f/2 has a lot of quirks and peculiarities that you have to learn about in order to get the most out of it.

Again, really sound advice... I guess I just find myself hooked on primes... Even though I have an excellent 70-200 I am constantly wondering what I could do with an equivalent prime... But hey, that's just me!

Well, you know your friend better than any of us. If he's into steep learning curves, then go for it. But make sure you're thinking of him and not you. LOL

Maybe subconsciously I'm thinking of a "shortcut" from "no knowledge" to "the best tools" without having to accumulate the intermediate equipment, which somehow seems like a waste... Probably not possible...

-- hide signature --


 photosen's gear list:photosen's gear list
Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 70D Canon EF 35mm F2.0 Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow