2200 review update

Started Aug 10, 2002 | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Leon Wittwer Forum Pro • Posts: 13,519
2200 review update

This is an update to the review I posted about a week ago. Much has been repeated so that folks who did not see the earlier review can catch up. The section on ink usage has been updated and I've made some comments on the black and white printing issue.

I am running the Epson 2200 Photo printer on a Mac under OS 9.2.2 and OS

10.1.2. I was somewhat disappointed that the driver does not allow custom paper

sizes. Hopefully, this will change with OS 10.2 coming out this month (August). I

also figured out howto change the black ink under OS 10. I first changed the ink and turned off the printer. I deleted the printer from the printer list in print manager. I then

turned on the printer and added the printer to the printer list in the print manager. The different ink was recognized.
So far, I have printed on premium semi-gloss, premium lustre, enhanced
matte (formerly archival matte), and Red River 47# matte 13 inch roll paper. I
printed using full color management and used the Epson provided profiles. I
did not use any color adjustment in the driver.

1) All prints came out very good. The prints matched my monitor quite well
and the quality was as good as or better than anything from my 1270 or 2000P.

2) I did one 1440 print and the quality was only very slight less than the
corresponding 2880 print. The 2880 had ever so slightly more crispness in the
detail. This was while viewing under magnification. I doubt that the
differences would be visible under normal viewing conditions.

3) There is a very slight bit of metamerism. Unlike the 2000P metamerism
which gave an unattractive green cast under high temperature illumination, the
2200 prints look good (if not very slightly different) under different
illuminations. The changes are comparable in magnitude to what I see with my
1270 dye based prints and I consider is a non-problem for my work.

4) I don't know about the longevity but I have begun a light fading test series
for the 2200 using a 2000P sample as a reference. More in a few months.

5) I've printed about 5244 square inches of print, almost all of it at 2280 dpi.
The vast majority has been on the Epson Premium Lustre paper.
My ink usage has been 2.0 light magenta, 1.7 magenta, 1.45 light cyan, 1.2 light
black, 0.85 yellow, 0.7 photo black, 0.54 cyan, and 0.33 matte black cartridges.
This totals to about 8.8 cartridges. These numbers are probably not all that
accurate as some were estimated from the printer diagnostics. This comes out to
about 600 square inches of print per cartridge. Assuming $10.76 per cartridge
(Apple site cost, you can do better.), the ink costs for a 4x6 print will be
$0.43. The ink costs for a 8x10 print will be $1.43.

6) The two black inks is a super idea. The black using the matte black on the
enhanced matte is very deep. The definition in the dark shadow areas seems
better than with my 1270. This may partly be due to the light black. The photo
black does a good job with the non-matte papers. I have printed some black and
white. They seemed quite good, certainly better than anything from my 1270 or
2000P. Considering how good the 2200 works without the grey balancer, all the
fuss over not getting it here in North America may be premature.

7) I did two speed tests. I printed a 12x16 inch image at 2880 and 1440 dpi
on enhanced matte paper. Both prints took about 40 seconds from pushing the
print button to beggining to print. At 2880, it took 30 minutes to print or
6.4 square inches per minute. An 8x10 would take approximately 12.5 minutes
to print. At 1440, it took 14.25 minutes or 13.5 square inches per minute.
An 8x10 would take about 5.9 minutes to print. Is the extra speed worth the
very slight degradation in print quality? Probably.

8) I did a resolution test on my 2200 using enhanced matte paper. I judged the
resolution to be somewhere between 150 to 200 lines per inch or 300 to 400
pixels per inch. I did a 1440 and a 2880 print. The resolution was comparable
but there was a significant difference. The lines at 2880 were clean and smooth
at the highest resolution but the 1440 were a bit ratty and irregular. This is
what the 2880 gives you. Of course, this means that you need real detail at
1/300th of an inch or so. This is at the limit of vision for many people. At
47, the average person can not focus much closer than a foot and that
translates into about 1/300th of an inch (without magnification). A younger
person who can focus down to six inches can see down to 1/600th of an inch
unaided and would be able to see differences between 1440 and 2880. Of course,
this requires an image with resolveable detail at 1/300th of an inch. That
means, in practice, printing an image with up to 400+ pixels per inch that
has fine details.

9) The printer (except for startup) is very quiet.

10) The Red River 47# matte paper worked will but has a bit of a glare in the
dark black areas. To get better results, I purchase enhanced matte (formerly
archival matte) in 24 inch rolls and cut to size for the 2000P and 2200.
Cutting to size is a pain so I still use the Red River paper for prints where
there are little or no deep blacks areas and where longevity is not a concern.

I like this printer. By the way, I have no connection with
Epson. I'm a federal civil servant with an expensive but very satisfying
hobby. You can see some of my stuff at
http://pws.prserv.net/lees_pics/landscapes.htm

ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow