In most cases the light entering this pathway would be insignificant,
but it happens. The primary mirror is partially transparent.
The D700 mirror could be different, but looking at the D70 mirror, only the central portion of the mirror looks semi-transparent.
After
all auto focusing takes place on an image cast through this mirror
then reflecting off of the secondary mirror.
The secondary mirror folds up directly under the primary mirror during the exposure. I believe that should seal the semi-transparent section.
I set the D300 into sensor cleaning mode and looked at the top of the chamber were the mirror is during exposure. It looks pretty tight to me. The bottom of both mirrors are backed by opaque material. I put a flashlight up to the VF. I didn't see any obvious light leakage.
If light/images can
pass through this mirror to focus, then it can certainly leak light
into long exposures.
As mentioned in a previous post, I've taken several 30 sec exposures at ISO 3200 with the D300 without covering the VF in a reasonably lit room with no obvious light leakage. In one I intentionally directed light into the viewfinder. I did the same with my D70 at ISO 1600. (The D70 exhibits pronounced amp glow under these conditions.) There was no difference between shots taken with the VF covered and uncovered as viewed on the camera's LCD.
That's why there is a viewfinder door on high
end models and a cap included with cheaper models.
It's definitely needed during exposure metering when the VF is not covered by the photog. That's reason enough to have the eyepiece shutter or cap.
The D700 manual does mention closing the eyepiece shutter to avoid "interfering with exposure". But I suspect this may just mean exposure metering.
I don't believe it's needed during the actual exposure. But I could be mistaken.
I don't know if Nikon specifies the extent of permissible light leakage around the mirror assembly. So I could just be lucky with my two cheaper bodies.
With wear and age I suppose the seal can become less effective.
Steve