4/3 has no focal length advantage-correct him if he is wrong

Started Nov 15, 2008 | Discussions thread
mxsi Regular Member • Posts: 233
Effective focal length

Rriley wrote:

genotypewriter wrote:

Actually your or my opinion can't change the fact that four thirds
pro lenses are overly heavy for what they should be, slow focusing
and they don't deliver the promised goods of fourthirds land. I'm
speaking from experience here...

your experience is worth jack when it is patently wrong
you quote dof equivalence with abandon, yet for some rather odd
reason you feel it necessary to refuse to see that the FL of 4/3rds
lenses are 2x

Or the focal length at which an optical system appears to be working. Not quite the same Riley. Or did you mean 2x crop factor? If yes then we know exactly what you are talking about.

either you have no idea or you are a loser plain and simple
go away

But the fact remains and your "go away" line does not change jack either. Simple indeed.

Murzik

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
vor
vor
BJL
BJL
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow