The REAL scoop on MX!

Started Nov 9, 2008 | Discussions thread
ebsilon Contributing Member • Posts: 628
Re: Pellicle, as bad as it gets...

Joseph S Wisniewski wrote:

Bernard Languillier wrote:

Joseph S Wisniewski wrote:

3. New lens line but will work with older ff lenses.

Do you think the new camera is going to be a pure EVF (or EVIL:
Electronic Viewfinder, Interchangeable Lens) camera without an SLR
optical viewfinder?

The back focus (minimum distance between rear element and sensor) for
FX is 39mm. That was determined 5 decades ago by the arc the mirror
made when it swings.

Trying to bring this thread back from dirt-throwing to the much more fun techie-nerd things: What if the mirror didn't swing the same way as it does in current (D)LSR's, but rather swung backwards underneath or above the sensor? I.e. so that swinging the mirror itself didn't add need for extra space - should be possible with some clever mechanics. Of course, it would necessitate extra space above or underneath the sensor, and the mechanics would be more complex. That should gain a few milimetres registration distance, though

-- hide signature --

Eirik ----------
n
[]O]

Visit my gallery at http://eirikbs.smugmug.com/

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
D5
jk
jk
jk
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow