LX3 RAW/JPEG vs. LX1 vs. F20 comparison

Started Aug 15, 2008 | Discussions thread
kernow Forum Pro • Posts: 12,441

KIWI Rik wrote:

Hi Oluv,

Thanks for doing these.....To me, they are the best set of examples
I've seen with regards to evaluation...I wish reviewers would do
something similar.....You have captured every element that is of
interest, in comparing issues that cause concern...

The LX3 output is much improved over the LX1, which has a similar
ugly output as my FZ50, everything is far to oversharpened and
grainy, especially foliage and people....The LX3 has a far more
natural look, albeit a little softer....But I prefer it to the older
VIII engine...

Regardless of sensor size I think Panny is doing a good job with this
new batch of cameras, compared to last year...

The F20 sure does do a good job...but it has other issues....and far
less features..


Yes, but you can process the LX1 image to be softer with less detail if that is what you prefer. You cannot put the detail back that is missing.
Oll an gwella,



[FZ30] * IS/L B-300 * IS/L B-Macro * Minolta No. 0, No. 1 & No. 2 * Sunpak 383 * Benbo Trekker

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow