LX3 RAW/JPEG vs. LX1 vs. F20 comparison

Started Aug 15, 2008 | Discussions thread
carlos roncatti
carlos roncatti Senior Member • Posts: 2,662
Re: LX3 RAW/JPEG vs. LX1 vs. F20 comparison

I completely agree about Silkypix.It looks pretty bad.(even worse with the LX1)

oluv wrote:

no i still have the camera. i did some further shots today.
unfortunately i am not satisified with the result i am getting from
silkypix, it produces quite a lot of "aquarell"-effects. i hope raw
therapee will support the LX3 soon, so we can definitely show what
the camera is capable of.
if not the strange lens-problem i would be quite happy with the
camera. it is a big step forward compared to my LX1. even if the LX3
renders a little less details than the LX1, there is less noise to
deal with either. you can push shadows quite a lot on the LX3 without
nasty noise effects. i couldn't do this with the LX1.

i will try to post some higher iso shots too. then on monday i will
return the camera and either ask for exchange or return it completely.

-- hide signature --

Carlos Roncatti Bomfim

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow