The Joy of Pixel Density

Started Jul 13, 2008 | Discussions thread
OP John Sheehy Forum Pro • Posts: 21,603
Re: The Joy of Pixel Density

Barry Fitzgerald wrote:

John Sheehy wrote:

8 hours, and only one reply. The silence is deafening. If I had
started a thread about how bad the megapixel race is, the thread
would be moving towards the 150 mark already. I guess people don't
know what to do with reality when it contradicts their beliefs.

John, I am almost certain you are some implant from a major camera
manufacturer, trying to justify more megapixels

That's what you have to tell yourself. I am only interested in the truth. I could never market something I didn't truly believe in.

Is this another one of those crop the APS SLR sensor size, to that of
the FZ-50, in some odd attempt to prove that the panasonic has a
better sensor?

No. It is to prove that the sensor is better per unit of area than DSLR sensors, because it has a higher pixel density, which is just a fact, that some people seem to have problems dealing with.

-- hide signature --

John

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
ck3
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow