Thom article and the 200-400mm

Started May 20, 2008 | Discussions thread
Mike Neary Veteran Member • Posts: 3,355
Re: Thom article and the 200-400mm

Thom Hogan wrote:

Carpus wrote:

I have this lens on order and having been eagarly waiting for it's
arrival. Why do I have an empty feeling inside now after reading
Thom's article?

Note that I haven't gotten rid of my 200-400mm. But I find it less
useful than I expected. At 20' I'll take the results obtains gets any
day. With a converter, or at long distances (60'+), well, not so
much. One reason why the review is so delayed is that I've had to
make sure it wasn't a sample problem nor a camera focusing problem.


thanks for clarifying that it's not sample variation from your perspective!

Moreover, I try to write lens reviews after extensive experience with
them in the field, not just static wall tests, and I don't get into
situations where the 200-400mm is needed as often as I do a 10mm ; ).

It's a good lens. But I don't believe it's the best zoom Nikon has
made, nor do I believe that is the best solution for most shooters.

But if I look around I see tons of what I would consider absolutely stellar images from the 200-400 VR - look at the bird shots by Ray Barlow, for example - a lot of which were shot at over 60 ft distance...



Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow