Ari Aikomus
Veteran Member
Hi,
I must confess to you that I bought back Zenitar 16/2.8 fish-eye lens ! Five months ago I had my first Zenitar (it was my first real fish-eye lens too), but after a month using I sold it and bought Pentax DA 10-17 fish-eye lens...
DA 10-17 was a great lens also, but because my bad economy I sold it too (and bought new K20D camera & Bigma)...Until now my widest lens was then 18-55II kit.
So - I'm happy Zen user again ;-D ...And I think that this isn't bad situation after all ! Although Pentax DA10-17 FE was a excellent fish-eye, it's very true that cheap Zenitar 16/2.8 can do normal wide-angle works more than fine. I could say that now from experience!
For those members who don't know zenitar so well, here are some useful links:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=17658788
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=25792119
My first Zen was very good copy of that Russian lens, but this new copy suffered from "infinity focus problem", which is actually quite common problem with zenitars - but quite easy to fix:
http://cpicture.net/zenitar/index.html
I did this fix to my new Zen and now it operate as it should work.
Some of Zen user say that zenitar is too soft wide open, but I can't confirm that...Actually I believe that it can be also that infinity focus problem which can cause bad IQ wide open.
...Here are some my tests - also zen wide open:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=26449833
http://www.kultakaari.fi/arska/laite/zenitar/album/index.html
***
Finally some my recent photos with my new Zen:
Zen, f/2.8:
Crop (no PP), notice quite nice bokeh...:
Zen, f/8:
Crop (no PP):
Unfished:
Cheers,
Ari
--
I must confess to you that I bought back Zenitar 16/2.8 fish-eye lens ! Five months ago I had my first Zenitar (it was my first real fish-eye lens too), but after a month using I sold it and bought Pentax DA 10-17 fish-eye lens...
DA 10-17 was a great lens also, but because my bad economy I sold it too (and bought new K20D camera & Bigma)...Until now my widest lens was then 18-55II kit.
So - I'm happy Zen user again ;-D ...And I think that this isn't bad situation after all ! Although Pentax DA10-17 FE was a excellent fish-eye, it's very true that cheap Zenitar 16/2.8 can do normal wide-angle works more than fine. I could say that now from experience!
For those members who don't know zenitar so well, here are some useful links:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=17658788
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=25792119
My first Zen was very good copy of that Russian lens, but this new copy suffered from "infinity focus problem", which is actually quite common problem with zenitars - but quite easy to fix:
http://cpicture.net/zenitar/index.html
I did this fix to my new Zen and now it operate as it should work.
Some of Zen user say that zenitar is too soft wide open, but I can't confirm that...Actually I believe that it can be also that infinity focus problem which can cause bad IQ wide open.
...Here are some my tests - also zen wide open:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=26449833
http://www.kultakaari.fi/arska/laite/zenitar/album/index.html
***
Finally some my recent photos with my new Zen:
Zen, f/2.8:
Crop (no PP), notice quite nice bokeh...:
Zen, f/8:
Crop (no PP):
Unfished:
Cheers,
Ari
--
- Ari Aikomus -