Anyone using 14-24 on a DX as a replacement for 20-35 on FF
I used to love using my 20-35 on my F5 and now use a Sigma 10-20 on my D2Xs for wide shots. The 10-20 is good for architecture but flares badly and a poor choice for my style of group portraiture.
I'm more interested in putting my money into lenses than a new body and feel the 14-24 may be a good choice for me due to (hopefully) better flare characteristics and less distortion at the long end for group portraiture, yet still very useful for architecture. It also gives me a lens I can use when I do upgrade to a FF sensor in maybe 1-2 years.
Anyone using the 14-24 who uses it in a similar manner? What are your thoughts on this choice versus other options?
|Post (hide subjects)||Posted by||When|
|Mar 6, 2008|
|Greenwich Village Winter by blucoyote|
from Your City - Snow
|Rifugio Locatelli & the Tre Cime di Lavaredo by James Rushforth|
from Astro Landscape
|Smokin' by Kukla|
|Ford GT by Jose Olivares|
from F is for...