How does the D3 achieve such high ISO?

Started Feb 17, 2008 | Discussions thread
PerL Forum Pro • Posts: 14,432
The bottom line....

ohyva wrote:

Marianne Oelund wrote:

ejmartin wrote:

Marianne, where are you getting your figure of 22K electrons at
saturation for the 1D3 at ISO 200? Mine has 71K electrons at
saturation for ISO 100 and about 38K at ISO 200. 22K seems awfully
low, more like the value for the 1D2.

Can you reconcile your values to Roger Clark's 12-bit unity gain ISO
value of 1000 for the Mk III? That would imply 20,500 electrons
full-scale at ISO 200.

First it's good to remember the full-well capacity in Canon cams are
reached at ISO100 while in D3 it's at ISO200. So comparison at ISO200
is apples against oranges. What's then more important, low noise in
general or low noise at certain expo-time&aperture settings, depends
then on the aimed use of the gear. I persponally prefer speed for
sport photos, so the new Nikon would be tempting if I'd not be so
committed with my current Canon gear.

Second I'm still sceptic about these well capacity "measurements". No
direct measurement method AFIAK (unless you probe into the chip which
I think has not been done (and would probably to some extend
interfere with the masurement). If done indirectly based on noise
figs, then I'd really love to know how all the different noise
sources are separated. And how to ensure there is no in-sensor
digital domain NR applied - which is reported by Sony to be one of
the methods how they have reduced the noise levels in their new CMOS
sensor technology.

As for the change in Clark's data, he had measured the gain at ISO
50, not realizing that ISO 50 is really ISO 100 overexposed by a
stop. So values for gain above ISO 50 are double what he intially
reported, and read noise in electrons consequently also doubled for
all ISO's above 50. (There was clearly a problem, since if you took
the original figures seriously, the 1D3 had the worst photon
collection efficiency of any Canon DSLR since before the 10D).

Thanks for the explanation - I was wondering. Has this also caused
an error in his unity-gain ISO calculation?
If the Mk III unity-gain ISO is actually closer to 2000, then the D3
and Mk III would be back to rough parity regarding read noise, with
the D3 retaining an advantage in shot noise.

...is the images. There have been many high ISO comparisions made between 1D3 an D3, but very few low ISO comparisions between these two.

In a swedish test (the magazine Kamera&Bild) the D3 at low ISOs could take more punishment in PP (lifting extreme shadows) than the 5D and the 1D3s. Here I suppose the larger photsites gave the D3 an advantage over the 1Ds3, and vs the 5D it had better shielded electronics.

It would be interesting to see a similar low ISO/postprocessing-ability comparision between the D3 and a 1D3 where the size of the photosites should be reasonably close and the shielding and the quality of the electronics probably are on the same level.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow