More megapixels, better photos: Fact or fiction?

Started Feb 7, 2008 | Discussions thread
Eric Fossum
Eric Fossum Senior Member • Posts: 1,381
Re: More megapixels, better photos: Fact or fiction?

John Sheehy wrote:

The fact is, the more you divide photons into more numerous, smaller
photosites, the less image noise you have to create. The smaller the
total number of photons that need to be read out of a sensor, the
less noise created as measured in photons. The standard deviation of
readout noise in a Canon 5D pixel at ISO 100 with up to 53200 photons
is about 30 photons. The standard deviation of readout noise in a
Panasonic FZ50 at ISO 100, with a maximum of 4800 photons, is about
3.5 photons. A 5D pixel covers about 16x as much area on a sensor as
an FZ50 pixel does. So, 16 FZ50 pixels collect about 4800*16 =
76,800 photons. The read noise for this super pixel is 3.5 photons
times the square root of 16, or 4. 3.5*4 = 14 photons of noise. So,
the 5D pixel has a noise floor a little over a stop higher than the
FZ50 "superpixel", and has slightly more shot noise, with somewhat
less photon collection. This is reality; not the myth going around
that more pixels makes sensors noisier.

No myth John, if I understand what you are saying correctly. Noise has many components, including photon shot noise that goes like the sqrt of the number of carriers, and readout noise, which is usually fixed as a function of signal. We usually care about signal to noise ratio, SNR. So for shot noise, S divided by sqrt (S) = sqrt(S). So while the noise is less, when people say "noiseier" they are almost always talking about SNR, which degrades with smaller pixel sizes for the most part.

Did I understand you correctly?
-Eric

 Eric Fossum's gear list:Eric Fossum's gear list
Sony RX100 II Nikon Coolpix P900
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
DRG
cpw
cpw
bkj
bkj
bkj
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow