You got it ALL wrong - Chasseur d'Images

Started Dec 23, 2007 | Discussions thread
roger lafrite New Member • Posts: 13
Re: To all, is

LeRentier wrote:

If Lafrite's opinion is that the magazine should have done better
than maybe he is in a position to create new test protocols which are
better adapted to the ever more complex cameras and lenses and thus
has a fantastic business opportunity.

The VELOCITY TEST engines exist and it uses by la fnac and chasseur by example

Perharps you are playing the idiot ?

Here I put the pictures of their test showing that chasseur have tested a bad copy !!!!

to be clear when a camera take it last sharp image a 25 meters when the previous model the mark II take his last sharp image at 13 meters it has obviously a problem

if you think it's not you LIES

when chasseur give five stars at this camera and write they didn't have seen a camera with AF problem they LIES

Now if you have an explanation to explain how a markIII fail at 25 meters and a e3 olympus at only 3 meters I am interested in your explanation.

note in photim the saff of chasseur prefer put me out of the forum Rather than answer me.

Now can you ask this question on photim and ask for an answer ? If you do it thank you in advance. I am very interested in the resplies of ronan loaec.

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow