D300 versus 20D continued analysis

Started Dec 5, 2007 | Discussions thread
mike7588 Regular Member • Posts: 250
D300 worse with noise

Arash Hazeghi wrote:

Hi,
As you see, Canon sesnor has lower noise and better
per-pixelsharpness/resolution. there is not much extra detail in D300
shot. At ISO 1600, D300 is considerably noisier, even resized to 20D
size,

however, the combination of D300/17-35/Nikon Capture deliver a
better image in terms of colors and tones, contrast and DR seems
better there is less fringe and blowup, leaves look much better and
natural.

That made me had a look again and again, and downloaded your pictures and compared them carefully, and I saw the 20D were eyecatchingly brighter and natural colors and tones, maybe because of the noise on D300.

Anyway,
Thank's for your time for doing the comparison.
This is very useful for me, and much appreciated.

Welldone

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
gml
jp
jp
jp
jp
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow