D300 versus 20D continued analysis

Started Dec 5, 2007 | Discussions thread
Beau Long Contributing Member • Posts: 972
Re: A few comments...

Photobug wrote:

1. What you got from D300 are generally inferior in noise and
sharpness than mine. Don't know why and can't prove/disprove unless
we shoot side-by-side.

2. Your high ISO 20D images show sign of NR though you said no NR was
applied. I see this on the 100% ISO 800 & 1600 garden gate shots.

3. You may need to experiment more with tone curve, WB, sharpening,
and even NR (in camera or in PP) to gain the most from D300. But so
far I do feel your results don't match my own or samples from Imaging
Resources.

4. Have fun & keep shooting!

Agreed.. your 1600's look noisier than my 3200's... something's not quite up to snuff there...
--

http://beaulong.exposuremanager.com
http://www.nikonians-images.org/galleries/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/108565

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
gml
jp
jp
jp
jp
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow