D300 versus 20D continued analysis

Started Dec 5, 2007 | Discussions thread
betterliving Senior Member • Posts: 1,077
Re: D300 versus 20D continued analysis

Give it up. It's not going to happen. This thread has been taken over by Canon bloggers.

I have just run tests of my 20d and D300 and both are fine. The D300 slightly better in noise and detail.

kevm14 wrote:

natureman wrote:

Arash is comparing 100% crops. That means he's showing both cameras
at their limits. This is NOT unfair to the Nikon D300. If the D300
images have to be downsized to 8mp to look as good as the 20D
pictures, then the D300 is, in reality, an 8mp camera.

The best way to do this is to upsize the smaller images to match the
larger ones. In other words, upsize the 20D shots to 12MP. It
becomes a lot easier to check for detail, noise, etc.

-- hide signature --

David

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
gml
jp
jp
jp
jp
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow