Nikon finally gets the noise down.

Started Nov 17, 2007 | Discussions thread
PerL Forum Pro • Posts: 14,049
Re: I finally understand Phil's rating

photo nuts wrote:

for image quality of 40D (9 out of 10).

From http://www.astrosurf.com/buil/nikon_test/test.htm

"According the current measures, the Canon 40D CMOS is slightly less
noisy than the CMOS Nikon D3 CMOS, but the gap is not very
significant......

The readout noise of the Nikon and Canon CMOS detectors is very
similar. The high ISO sensitivity displayed by Nikon is for the
marketing: Nikon D3 CMOS (and also the CMOS D300 CMOS - Sony origin)
is a very high quality sensor, but in the end, Nikon just rises now
to the level of Canon technology."

So, if Canon has implemented a more aggressive noise-reduction
(fortunately NOT) like Nikon, the 40D may very well have the same
performance as the D3? Ho, ho, ho....

Which the 40D obviously not has, no matter how much you work with NR, so something is probably not right.

In this analysis the D3 tops every quality parameter regarding quantum efficiency, light collecting ability, etc. Also interesting to note is that the D300 seems to be a 1/3 stop more sensitive than the 40D, it has been the other way around before.
http://theory.uchicago.edu/~ejm/pix/20d/posts/tests/D300_40D_tests/
--
Small D200 gallery:
http://www.pbase.com/interactive/d200_12
Small D40 gallery:
http://www.pbase.com/interactive/d40_12
Small Nikon P5000 gallery:
http://www.pbase.com/interactive/nikonp5000_12
http://www.pbase.com/interactive

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
tko
thw
thw
DRG
tko
thw
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow