DavidMillier
Forum Pro
Yes, it can be difficult. It is particularly difficult on forums where there is a high degree of partisanship. The Sigma forum for example frequently does not accept neutral statements as neutral but regards them as hostile. Sometimes it reminds me of the comments of a colleague from Belfast:
"Everyone is a catholic or a protestant in Belfast"
"So, what if you are an atheist?"
"You're a proddie..."
Galleries and website: http://www.whisperingcat.co.uk/mainindex.htm
"Everyone is a catholic or a protestant in Belfast"
"So, what if you are an atheist?"
"You're a proddie..."
--I can put up with a certain degree of bad grammar; as has been
pointed out, one may not know the background of the individual
concerned and it is of no great import if the meaning is grasped.
However, I cannot forgive that which is all too prevalent within
these forums.
That is, complete misunderstanding of an opinion or point raised,
regardless of how accurately the statement is made.
I would like to believe that I have a good mastery of English but,
frequently, posts of mine are entirely mis-represented by those who
reply, even though I am most careful in my choice of words and
phraseology. Indeed, it is clear that I am far from alone in being
treated this way, as I read replies to other posts.
Whether such is caused by deliberate mischievousness, outrageous
partisanship, or just ignorance, I do not know. Of course I
understand the likelihood of some of this would to be down to
trolling and flaming, but it becomes tiresome when there never seems
to be a single thread without examples to be found.
Perhaps my only recourse (and that of others similarly sinned
against) is to allow the 'offender' one opportunity to grasp and
accept my meaning before reporting them for one of the offences
listed in the posting rules.
Galleries and website: http://www.whisperingcat.co.uk/mainindex.htm