Photography Rules at Baseball Picture Day

mark kay

Veteran Member
Messages
5,451
Reaction score
0
Location
Bay Area, CA, US
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
 
Mark,

What type of photos were you trying to take? Candids or posed shots? I don't see -- rules or no rules -- where she could prevent you from taking candids in a public area. But if the players were posed, then some restrictions would certainly be valid, and you would be subject to their discretion. Part of this would have to do with contractual agreements with the athletic association. In addition, poses have a certain "intellectual" value, and might be protected accordingly. But for candids, any attempt to stop you might qualify as harassment.

M
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
 
The restrictions were not part of the league rules. The year before there was no problem and when i said this.. i was told it was a different photography company. It was clearly the photography group who made this rule. If I wanted to take pictures of my son or team then that is my right. The photo company had no rights to place any restrictions. they have no jurisdication over the league. If I wanted to sell the photos that may be a different story but even thenn I believe it would be the rightof the league to decide. mark
Mark,

What type of photos were you trying to take? Candids or posed
shots? I don't see -- rules or no rules -- where she could prevent
you from taking candids in a public area. But if the players were
posed, then some restrictions would certainly be valid, and you
would be subject to their discretion. Part of this would have to do
with contractual agreements with the athletic association. In
addition, poses have a certain "intellectual" value, and might be
protected accordingly. But for candids, any attempt to stop you
might qualify as harassment.

M
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
 
Let me ask you this. Were you taking pictures of the team as a group, set up by the photographer(s)? Were you shooting over their shoulders? Wait until they were done, then shoot? Or were you just taking candid shots. What specifically was the lady taking pictures of? Think of it this way. You are shooting formals at a wedding, everything is set up, you pose the wedding party, and Uncle Joe starts taking pictures of the group. Don't you think this would cut into your print sales? Heck, the bride may as well get the prints from Uncle Joe for free rather than pay you for the "same" shots. Not to mention his flash is firing off your slaved lights making you miss shots and/or you have to wait for it to recycle.

Put yourself in their shoes. If all you were doing is candid snap shots, then perhaps they were intimidated by your 1D. School and sports photography can get very competitive. Look at the senior market/yearbook/school photographers.

I don't know the whole story, so I can just speculate.
Mark,

What type of photos were you trying to take? Candids or posed
shots? I don't see -- rules or no rules -- where she could prevent
you from taking candids in a public area. But if the players were
posed, then some restrictions would certainly be valid, and you
would be subject to their discretion. Part of this would have to do
with contractual agreements with the athletic association. In
addition, poses have a certain "intellectual" value, and might be
protected accordingly. But for candids, any attempt to stop you
might qualify as harassment.

M
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
 
We pay team dues and that pays for a package of prints for each family (in advance). Extra photos are paid for in advance. So there is no way even if i was selling photosthat it would affect their sales. I was standing behind them and not using a flash so there was no interference.


Let me ask you this. Were you taking pictures of the team as a
group, set up by the photographer(s)? Were you shooting over their
shoulders? Wait until they were done, then shoot? Or were you
just taking candid shots. What specifically was the lady taking
pictures of? Think of it this way. You are shooting formals at a
wedding, everything is set up, you pose the wedding party, and
Uncle Joe starts taking pictures of the group. Don't you think
this would cut into your print sales? Heck, the bride may as well
get the prints from Uncle Joe for free rather than pay you for the
"same" shots. Not to mention his flash is firing off your slaved
lights making you miss shots and/or you have to wait for it to
recycle.

Put yourself in their shoes. If all you were doing is candid snap
shots, then perhaps they were intimidated by your 1D. School and
sports photography can get very competitive. Look at the senior
market/yearbook/school photographers.

I don't know the whole story, so I can just speculate.
Mark,

What type of photos were you trying to take? Candids or posed
shots? I don't see -- rules or no rules -- where she could prevent
you from taking candids in a public area. But if the players were
posed, then some restrictions would certainly be valid, and you
would be subject to their discretion. Part of this would have to do
with contractual agreements with the athletic association. In
addition, poses have a certain "intellectual" value, and might be
protected accordingly. But for candids, any attempt to stop you
might qualify as harassment.

M
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
 
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

Mark
When you said that did you stand your ground and start shooting? You had every right to since it was on public property.
 
I have run into similar restrictions at high school graduations, dance recitals, etc.

I understand the ethics and courtesy of respecting another photographer's work, but the fact remains if this event was taking place in a publicly-owned and open facility, and you were not interfering with the work, you had every right to bring and use your camera - no matter how "professional" it is.

I was once arrested for standing up for my rights (photographing the scene of a grand prix car racing crash during a practice session at a public fairgrounds) to make pictures. I was there as a journalist and stuck to my ground, even as I was harassed and finally attacked by race personnel (and I was far enough away to need 200mm lens). Unfortunately, the incident, for which I was eventually vindicated, cost me thousands of dollars and some embarrassment.

Was I right? Yes. Would I do it again? I'm not sure. Sadly, I will admit it has had a somewhat chilling effect on my journalistic do's and don'ts.
Put yourself in their shoes. If all you were doing is candid snap
shots, then perhaps they were intimidated by your 1D. School and
sports photography can get very competitive. Look at the senior
market/yearbook/school photographers.

I don't know the whole story, so I can just speculate.
Mark,

What type of photos were you trying to take? Candids or posed
shots? I don't see -- rules or no rules -- where she could prevent
you from taking candids in a public area. But if the players were
posed, then some restrictions would certainly be valid, and you
would be subject to their discretion. Part of this would have to do
with contractual agreements with the athletic association. In
addition, poses have a certain "intellectual" value, and might be
protected accordingly. But for candids, any attempt to stop you
might qualify as harassment.

M
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
---------------------------------Bob Markey II http://www.palmswestpress.comRoyal Palm Beach/Wellington, Fla.
 
Let me ask you this. Were you taking pictures of the team as a
group, set up by the photographer(s)? Were you shooting over their
shoulders? Wait until they were done, then shoot? Or were you
just taking candid shots. What specifically was the lady taking
pictures of? Think of it this way. You are shooting formals at a
wedding, everything is set up, you pose the wedding party, and
Uncle Joe starts taking pictures of the group. Don't you think
this would cut into your print sales? Heck, the bride may as well
get the prints from Uncle Joe for free rather than pay you for the
"same" shots. Not to mention his flash is firing off your slaved
lights making you miss shots and/or you have to wait for it to
recycle.

Put yourself in their shoes. If all you were doing is candid snap
shots, then perhaps they were intimidated by your 1D. School and
sports photography can get very competitive. Look at the senior
market/yearbook/school photographers.

I don't know the whole story, so I can just speculate.
I took photos at the wedding of my sister in-law and the photographer didn't say one word. I took shots of his formals and candids at the reception. He was totally fine with it. As a matter of fact, her favorite is one that I took. The photographer got paid and Beth had more pictures to choose from.

If they were sooooo concerned about loosing sales because people were taking their own photos then they should not have done it on public property. Anyone on public property can legally take a picture of anything they want even if they are taking a picture of something or someone on private property. The photographer, no matter what the league agreement is, was wrong when they tried to stop photo taking.
 
Come on people--we as professional photographers rely on our expertise
to set up and capture the image in the best way possible. I feel for the team
photographers you may think that "man they are making a killing on the
photos" but by the time the league gets their share there is not a lot of

money left for the photograher. When I first started my professional photgraphy career I did the team thing but did not do it for long because of the little money that was made from the shoot.
When you are shooting over the photographers shoulder-strobe or not-
you are taking a shot that was set up by someone else and you should not

take it!! If you did this to me while I was shooting a wedding I personally would ask you to stop.
Take your D1 and take candids of the games etc. you should not have
any problems and let the photograher that has to make a living by taking

these team photos do his thing. You would not want someone to look over your shoulder while you were writing a paper or article for publication and then they wound up getting it published first.

Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouller!! Let the Good Times Roll!!

travelingman
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

Mark
When you said that did you stand your ground and start shooting?
You had every right to since it was on public property.
--travelingman
 
Mark,

You still havn't said what it is you were actually taking photos of. We they posed shots or candids?

M
Let me ask you this. Were you taking pictures of the team as a
group, set up by the photographer(s)? Were you shooting over their
shoulders? Wait until they were done, then shoot? Or were you
just taking candid shots. What specifically was the lady taking
pictures of? Think of it this way. You are shooting formals at a
wedding, everything is set up, you pose the wedding party, and
Uncle Joe starts taking pictures of the group. Don't you think
this would cut into your print sales? Heck, the bride may as well
get the prints from Uncle Joe for free rather than pay you for the
"same" shots. Not to mention his flash is firing off your slaved
lights making you miss shots and/or you have to wait for it to
recycle.

Put yourself in their shoes. If all you were doing is candid snap
shots, then perhaps they were intimidated by your 1D. School and
sports photography can get very competitive. Look at the senior
market/yearbook/school photographers.

I don't know the whole story, so I can just speculate.
Mark,

What type of photos were you trying to take? Candids or posed
shots? I don't see -- rules or no rules -- where she could prevent
you from taking candids in a public area. But if the players were
posed, then some restrictions would certainly be valid, and you
would be subject to their discretion. Part of this would have to do
with contractual agreements with the athletic association. In
addition, poses have a certain "intellectual" value, and might be
protected accordingly. But for candids, any attempt to stop you
might qualify as harassment.

M
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
 
THey were getting in a line up and while they were getting in the line up i took the shots. so they were posed to some degree. mark
You still havn't said what it is you were actually taking photos
of. We they posed shots or candids?

M
Let me ask you this. Were you taking pictures of the team as a
group, set up by the photographer(s)? Were you shooting over their
shoulders? Wait until they were done, then shoot? Or were you
just taking candid shots. What specifically was the lady taking
pictures of? Think of it this way. You are shooting formals at a
wedding, everything is set up, you pose the wedding party, and
Uncle Joe starts taking pictures of the group. Don't you think
this would cut into your print sales? Heck, the bride may as well
get the prints from Uncle Joe for free rather than pay you for the
"same" shots. Not to mention his flash is firing off your slaved
lights making you miss shots and/or you have to wait for it to
recycle.

Put yourself in their shoes. If all you were doing is candid snap
shots, then perhaps they were intimidated by your 1D. School and
sports photography can get very competitive. Look at the senior
market/yearbook/school photographers.

I don't know the whole story, so I can just speculate.
Mark,

What type of photos were you trying to take? Candids or posed
shots? I don't see -- rules or no rules -- where she could prevent
you from taking candids in a public area. But if the players were
posed, then some restrictions would certainly be valid, and you
would be subject to their discretion. Part of this would have to do
with contractual agreements with the athletic association. In
addition, poses have a certain "intellectual" value, and might be
protected accordingly. But for candids, any attempt to stop you
might qualify as harassment.

M
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
 
Actually someone whisperedto me who saw this .. this is a public area.. so that is when i said .. I am going to go take the shots. I in no way interfered at all. I was way off to the side. I only took my kids team, no body else.
I understand the ethics and courtesy of respecting another
photographer's work, but the fact remains if this event was taking
place in a publicly-owned and open facility, and you were not
interfering with the work, you had every right to bring and use
your camera - no matter how "professional" it is.

I was once arrested for standing up for my rights (photographing
the scene of a grand prix car racing crash during a practice
session at a public fairgrounds) to make pictures. I was there as a
journalist and stuck to my ground, even as I was harassed and
finally attacked by race personnel (and I was far enough away to
need 200mm lens). Unfortunately, the incident, for which I was
eventually vindicated, cost me thousands of dollars and some
embarrassment.

Was I right? Yes. Would I do it again? I'm not sure. Sadly, I will
admit it has had a somewhat chilling effect on my journalistic do's
and don'ts.
Put yourself in their shoes. If all you were doing is candid snap
shots, then perhaps they were intimidated by your 1D. School and
sports photography can get very competitive. Look at the senior
market/yearbook/school photographers.

I don't know the whole story, so I can just speculate.
Mark,

What type of photos were you trying to take? Candids or posed
shots? I don't see -- rules or no rules -- where she could prevent
you from taking candids in a public area. But if the players were
posed, then some restrictions would certainly be valid, and you
would be subject to their discretion. Part of this would have to do
with contractual agreements with the athletic association. In
addition, poses have a certain "intellectual" value, and might be
protected accordingly. But for candids, any attempt to stop you
might qualify as harassment.

M
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
--
-------------------------------
Bob Markey II
http://www.palmswestpress.com
Royal Palm Beach/Wellington, Fla.
 
The photo packages were paid for in advance. Even if i give away prints for free there is no way I am taking a cent from the photographers. Mark
Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouller!! Let the Good Times Roll!!

travelingman
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

Mark
When you said that did you stand your ground and start shooting?
You had every right to since it was on public property.
--
travelingman
 
Come on people--we as professional photographers rely on our
expertise
to set up and capture the image in the best way possible. I feel
for the team
photographers you may think that "man they are making a killing on
the
photos" but by the time the league gets their share there is not a
lot of
money left for the photograher.
When I first started my professional photgraphy career I did the
team thing but did not do it for long because of the little money
that was made from the shoot.
When you are shooting over the photographers shoulder-strobe or not-
you are taking a shot that was set up by someone else and you
should not
take it!! If you did this to me while I was shooting a wedding I
personally would ask you to stop.
Take your D1 and take candids of the games etc. you should not have
any problems and let the photograher that has to make a living by
taking
these team photos do his thing.
You would not want someone to look over your shoulder while you
were writing a paper or article for publication and then they wound
up getting it published first.

Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouller!! Let the Good Times Roll!!

travelingman
I don't want to get into an argument with you. However, just because you are getting paid to take photographs does not mean that others can not. That's why we have laws that not only protect your right to make money but also protect the rights of others to take photos also. I'm sorry but the only place that you have the right to make someone stop taking pictures of their own is in your studio. In a church it's the church that has the right to allow or not allow photos to be taken. You may think it's wrong but the law is not on your side on this point. Photographer's photos are protected but not there exclusive "right" to take those photos.

Again, I have no desire to go back and forth about this but the law is clear about this and the photographer was wrong. I would request that the league not use that photographer in the future because of this. The parents are the ones who paid for the league, officials and the photographer. This was rude and pitiful teatment of the people that were footing the bill and should not be allowed.
 
Come on people--we as professional photographers rely on our
expertise
to set up and capture the image in the best way possible. I feel
for the team
photographers you may think that "man they are making a killing on
the
photos" but by the time the league gets their share there is not a
lot of
money left for the photograher.
When I first started my professional photgraphy career I did the
team thing but did not do it for long because of the little money
that was made from the shoot.
When you are shooting over the photographers shoulder-strobe or not-
you are taking a shot that was set up by someone else and you
should not
take it!! If you did this to me while I was shooting a wedding I
personally would ask you to stop.
Take your D1 and take candids of the games etc. you should not have
any problems and let the photograher that has to make a living by
taking
these team photos do his thing.
You would not want someone to look over your shoulder while you
were writing a paper or article for publication and then they wound
up getting it published first.

Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouller!! Let the Good Times Roll!!

travelingman
I don't want to get into an argument with you. However, just
because you are getting paid to take photographs does not mean that
others can not. That's why we have laws that not only protect your
right to make money but also protect the rights of others to take
photos also. I'm sorry but the only place that you have the right
to make someone stop taking pictures of their own is in your
studio. In a church it's the church that has the right to allow or
not allow photos to be taken. You may think it's wrong but the law
is not on your side on this point. Photographer's photos are
protected but not there exclusive "right" to take those photos.

Again, I have no desire to go back and forth about this but the law
is clear about this and the photographer was wrong. I would
request that the league not use that photographer in the future
because of this. The parents are the ones who paid for the league,
officials and the photographer. This was rude and pitiful teatment
of the people that were footing the bill and should not be allowed.
5 I actually am planning on writing a letter to the league and copy it to the photographer. I got their name and email. mark
 
5 I actually am planning on writing a letter to the league and copy
it to the photographer. I got their name and email. mark
A letter with other parent's signatures protesting both your treatmant and the use of this photographer in the future will carry more wieght. Good luck.
 
Greg thanks. The issue is that for my son's benefit I need to balance his needs and mine. If i make a really big deal then it may look like i am a trouble maker in general which i am not and if the parents are difficult then in future years when the kids are drafted it may be held against him. I think I will write the letter and send by email to the president of the league. thanks Mark
5 I actually am planning on writing a letter to the league and copy
it to the photographer. I got their name and email. mark
A letter with other parent's signatures protesting both your
treatmant and the use of this photographer in the future will carry
more wieght. Good luck.
 
Greg thanks. The issue is that for my son's benefit I need to
balance his needs and mine. If i make a really big deal then it
may look like i am a trouble maker in general which i am not and
if the parents are difficult then in future years when the kids are
drafted it may be held against him. I think I will write the
letter and send by email to the president of the league. thanks Mark
It does sound like you are using your head. I also think that it is terrific that you are putting your son first. Again, good luck.
 
if you are shooting a pose that ANY photographer has set up without their permission, that is extremely bad etiquette. You flat just don't do that.

If on the other hand, you were posing your own shots, then that is different. The type of camera you have, has nothing to do with it.

There is much more to photography than having the most up to date hardware.
Here is something that was quite interesting that happened to me
today. My son's baseball team like the others in our town had
picture day. I brought my 1D and 28-70L lens to take a few shots
but I did order a package of photos from the photo company.

The lady in charge told me that anyone other than the hired
photographers were allowed to take photos and she escorted me to
the side. I thought this is crazy. I told her I ordered a big
package so i was not there to rip her off. She said sorry but that
is the rule-no exceptions. As I was stewing on the sidelines, I
finally walked back and told her that it was a public park and if
she wanted to call the police and have me arrested she could.

A few minutes later, I saw her escorting a lady with her point and
shoot to another team to take photos-- I questioned her about that
and she said the lady said she was not going to take the whole
teams photo but she was clicking away. i took a photo of this as
evidence. Of course, I was initially just trying to get some shots
of my son before the team photo.

I really think she might of thought I was doing professional
photography with the 1D. The actual photographers were all coming
up and saying what a great camera this was. They had not used them
yet but did have EOS 1V and D30s.

Anyway, I am going to write a note to the baseball league and copy
the photography company on it. I really think this was ridiculous.

Mark
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top