Film versus DSLR dynamic range

Started Jul 24, 2007 | Discussions thread
PIXSurgeon Veteran Member • Posts: 4,009
To satisfy your criteria...

Jay Turberville wrote:

There is some slight non-linearity in real life in the darkest
shadows which is probably due to lens flare. That probably explains
why we can actually reach and even exceed a tiny bit the theoretical
DR limits. You can see that slight non-linearity in this Imatest
graph. It is interesting on its own merits, but I don't think it has
much relevance to practical photography with most cameras. Note the
otherwise linear response.

...and to demonstrate the value/importance of the equipment, here you go (notice the improved non-linearity at the top-bottom, and, most importantly, the MASSIVELY improved signal-to-noise ratios acrross the tonal band, when compared to yours, which, in all fairness, I do not know WTF you got such limited ratios):

http://www.pbase.com/feharmat/image/45161473/original

(and the above is already after TRC's applied, and with basically NO noise-reduction!) NO wonder, now, what you are complaining about "shadows"... DUDE, you need A NEW CAM! 8-))

And the pretty much the very same processing used (above) to generate these sample (trivial) images, for example:

http://www.pbase.com/feharmat/image/44661287/original
http://www.pbase.com/feharmat/image/61209434/original
http://www.pbase.com/feharmat/image/41090981/original

-- hide signature --

TIP: If you do not like this post, simply press the 'COMPLAINT' button. Mommy/Daddy are just one click away.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow