Lensmate adapter vs Canon adapter

xuy_98

Active member
Messages
75
Reaction score
9
Location
US
Lensmate looks nice, 49mm, silver. Better color.
Canon: 58mm, black.

That's all I can tell. I remember one said Canon using 58mm has its own reason.

Which one is better? Or Lensmate is good enough.

If using Lensmate, I can't use Canon's lens since they are all 58mm unless buy another convertor.

Any opinion? Thanks.
 
BTW, what's the best place for buying filters?
Lensmate looks nice, 49mm, silver. Better color.
Canon: 58mm, black.

That's all I can tell. I remember one said Canon using 58mm has its
own reason.

Which one is better? Or Lensmate is good enough.

If using Lensmate, I can't use Canon's lens since they are all 58mm
unless buy another convertor.

Any opinion? Thanks.
 
Even though Canon's black lens adapter may be an attractive option to black G2 owners, the lens shadow created by built-in flash is still the problem. Lensmate will introduce black adapter shortly and as long as EF 50mm f1.8 II lens are in this market, people who owns G2 and Canon SLR would prefer Lensmate with step-up ring (49mm to 52mm vs. Canon's 58mm to 52mm)
Lensmate looks nice, 49mm, silver. Better color.
Canon: 58mm, black.
That's all I can tell. I remember one said Canon using 58mm has its
own reason.
Which one is better? Or Lensmate is good enough.
If using Lensmate, I can't use Canon's lens since they are all 58mm
unless buy another convertor.
Any opinion? Thanks.
 
It's all a matter of personal preference. You can make a case for both..or even the ones from Tiffen. I purchased the Lensmate because I want to play around with 3 filters: Linear Polarizer, UV and ND. The Lensmate is 49mm and that's a popular size (among others) for filters. I also want to buy the Olympus A28 W/A lens which is 49mm (part that attaches to camera's adapter). Also, I had a hard time getting my hands on the Tiffen. In the end, I'm happy with the champagne coloured Lensmate. Looks neat and looks even better when I place the G2's cap on the end. It doesn't actually fit anymore but it does give me an idea how it'll look if it did.

The service from Susan Doel who runs Lensmate is great (as many will attest to...including myself). Besides, once you've taken the Lensmate adapter out of the square box it's shipped in, you can enjoy the BIG bubble wrap. Those are the biggest bubble wrap bubbles I've ever seen and they make a LOUD POP when burst. Much more entertaining than those regular size bubble wraps. ;)

Do a search in this forum using "Lensmate + Canon" and you'll see that this subject has been debated extensively".
Lensmate looks nice, 49mm, silver. Better color.
Canon: 58mm, black.

That's all I can tell. I remember one said Canon using 58mm has its
own reason.

Which one is better? Or Lensmate is good enough.

If using Lensmate, I can't use Canon's lens since they are all 58mm
unless buy another convertor.

Any opinion? Thanks.
 
So that was the reason you bought the Lensmate, the popping bubble wrap!!

I have Lensmate for my G1 (you can tell that I am an oldie) and it is great. A lot of peple are complaining that the Cannon one is too big: not only the flash, but also the optical viewfinder is blocked.

For filters, I use 2filters.com and liked it very well. Very good price, free shipping for > $50 orders.

Enjoy.

Lobster
The service from Susan Doel who runs Lensmate is great (as many
will attest to...including myself). Besides, once you've taken the
Lensmate adapter out of the square box it's shipped in, you can
enjoy the BIG bubble wrap. Those are the biggest bubble wrap
bubbles I've ever seen and they make a LOUD POP when burst. Much
more entertaining than those regular size bubble wraps. ;)

Do a search in this forum using "Lensmate + Canon" and you'll see
that this subject has been debated extensively".
Lensmate looks nice, 49mm, silver. Better color.
Canon: 58mm, black.

That's all I can tell. I remember one said Canon using 58mm has its
own reason.

Which one is better? Or Lensmate is good enough.

If using Lensmate, I can't use Canon's lens since they are all 58mm
unless buy another convertor.

Any opinion? Thanks.
 
I use the Tiffen adapter, which supports my Tiffen Megaplus 2X telephoto and .75X wideangle converters without need for stepup rings. It is black, and my G2 and both Tiffen converters are silver, but I don't find the contrasting colors to be a problem. (I also have the Canon 1.5X telephoto converter, and use a Canon adapter with that lens.)

I generally keep my Tiffen converter, capped with the skylight filter, mounted on the camera to protect the G2's zoom lens behind it.

Phil Douglis
It's all a matter of personal preference. You can make a case for
both..or even the ones from Tiffen. I purchased the Lensmate
because I want to play around with 3 filters: Linear Polarizer, UV
and ND. The Lensmate is 49mm and that's a popular size (among
others) for filters. I also want to buy the Olympus A28 W/A lens
which is 49mm (part that attaches to camera's adapter). Also, I
had a hard time getting my hands on the Tiffen. In the end, I'm
happy with the champagne coloured Lensmate. Looks neat and looks
even better when I place the G2's cap on the end. It doesn't
actually fit anymore but it does give me an idea how it'll look if
it did.

The service from Susan Doel who runs Lensmate is great (as many
will attest to...including myself). Besides, once you've taken the
Lensmate adapter out of the square box it's shipped in, you can
enjoy the BIG bubble wrap. Those are the biggest bubble wrap
bubbles I've ever seen and they make a LOUD POP when burst. Much
more entertaining than those regular size bubble wraps. ;)

Do a search in this forum using "Lensmate + Canon" and you'll see
that this subject has been debated extensively".
Lensmate looks nice, 49mm, silver. Better color.
Canon: 58mm, black.

That's all I can tell. I remember one said Canon using 58mm has its
own reason.

Which one is better? Or Lensmate is good enough.

If using Lensmate, I can't use Canon's lens since they are all 58mm
unless buy another convertor.

Any opinion? Thanks.
--Phil DouglisDirector, The Douglis Visual WorkshopsPhoenix, [email protected]
 
Hey Phil. Long time no hear from. How do you find the G2 and Tiffen lenses? Is the vignetting a problem with the Tiffens? How would you rate the quality of those lenses (since you teach photography)?
I generally keep my Tiffen converter, capped with the skylight
filter, mounted on the camera to protect the G2's zoom lens behind
it.

Phil Douglis
It's all a matter of personal preference. You can make a case for
both..or even the ones from Tiffen. I purchased the Lensmate
because I want to play around with 3 filters: Linear Polarizer, UV
and ND. The Lensmate is 49mm and that's a popular size (among
others) for filters. I also want to buy the Olympus A28 W/A lens
which is 49mm (part that attaches to camera's adapter). Also, I
had a hard time getting my hands on the Tiffen. In the end, I'm
happy with the champagne coloured Lensmate. Looks neat and looks
even better when I place the G2's cap on the end. It doesn't
actually fit anymore but it does give me an idea how it'll look if
it did.

The service from Susan Doel who runs Lensmate is great (as many
will attest to...including myself). Besides, once you've taken the
Lensmate adapter out of the square box it's shipped in, you can
enjoy the BIG bubble wrap. Those are the biggest bubble wrap
bubbles I've ever seen and they make a LOUD POP when burst. Much
more entertaining than those regular size bubble wraps. ;)

Do a search in this forum using "Lensmate + Canon" and you'll see
that this subject has been debated extensively".
Lensmate looks nice, 49mm, silver. Better color.
Canon: 58mm, black.

That's all I can tell. I remember one said Canon using 58mm has its
own reason.

Which one is better? Or Lensmate is good enough.

If using Lensmate, I can't use Canon's lens since they are all 58mm
unless buy another convertor.

Any opinion? Thanks.
--
Phil Douglis
Director, The Douglis Visual Workshops
Phoenix, Arizona
[email protected]
 
You should try bursting one of those suckers. POP! After that, pop pop pop just doesn't do it. The packaging the Lensmate comes in is maybe, a bit overkill, but it's good to see some thought was put into protecting it. Perhaps Susan understands the postal service better than....

For filters I will check out 2Filters and B&H. I may order the filters at the same time as the A28. If I can get it cheaper locally, I will. We'll see.
I have Lensmate for my G1 (you can tell that I am an oldie) and it
is great. A lot of peple are complaining that the Cannon one is
too big: not only the flash, but also the optical viewfinder is
blocked.

For filters, I use 2filters.com and liked it very well. Very good
price, free shipping for > $50 orders.

Enjoy.

Lobster
The service from Susan Doel who runs Lensmate is great (as many
will attest to...including myself). Besides, once you've taken the
Lensmate adapter out of the square box it's shipped in, you can
enjoy the BIG bubble wrap. Those are the biggest bubble wrap
bubbles I've ever seen and they make a LOUD POP when burst. Much
more entertaining than those regular size bubble wraps. ;)

Do a search in this forum using "Lensmate + Canon" and you'll see
that this subject has been debated extensively".
Lensmate looks nice, 49mm, silver. Better color.
Canon: 58mm, black.

That's all I can tell. I remember one said Canon using 58mm has its
own reason.

Which one is better? Or Lensmate is good enough.

If using Lensmate, I can't use Canon's lens since they are all 58mm
unless buy another convertor.

Any opinion? Thanks.
 
The service from Susan Doel who runs Lensmate is great (as many
will attest to...including myself). Besides, once you've taken the
Lensmate adapter out of the square box it's shipped in, you can
enjoy the BIG bubble wrap. Those are the biggest bubble wrap
bubbles I've ever seen and they make a LOUD POP when burst. Much
more entertaining than those regular size bubble wraps. ;)
HAHHAHAHAHHAH

I played with that kind of bubble wrap before; they come double-wrapped with my NetMD player. :D--Underbid the competitors and then, after the customer is committed, say, 'Oops, you really need to buy more stuff to make this work. Did I forget to mention that?' -- Scott Adams =[ The Dilbert Future ]=Goto http://www.printerboyweb.net/G2 for my own little gallery. =)
 
Ok, my mind is set, I sent my order through PayPal. 49mm caps I can buy one when I get the 420EX.--Underbid the competitors and then, after the customer is committed, say, 'Oops, you really need to buy more stuff to make this work. Did I forget to mention that?' -- Scott Adams =[ The Dilbert Future ]=Goto http://www.printerboyweb.net/G2 for my own little gallery. =)
 
this topic has been fully discussed so many times
in much detail. Do a search, and all your prayors
and questions will be answered I promise you.
 
Hi, Justme:

Good to hear from you, too. So far, I'm delighted with the G2 and my Tiffen .75x and 2x converters, as well as my Canon 1.5x converter. My lens range is not really hampered by whatever vignetting might occur. For example, my .75x Tiffen wideangle converter will not vignette at all. I am getting a zoom range with it equal to a 25mm to 76mm zoom lens in 35mm equivalence.

When I reach that 76mm point and want to go a bit beyond it, I use my the G2s own 34mm-102mm G2 lens. When I want to go longer than 100mm, I go to my Canon 1.5x medium telephoto coverter. Although Canon advises us to use this lens only at it's full 152mm setting, I find that I can actually zoom with it from between 100mm to 152mm. (Vignetting begins at about 100mm with this lens.)

My Tiffen 2x long telephoto converter, however, can be used only at it's full 152mm length. If you zoom back with it to any degree, it will begin to vignette.

Using the Canon G2's zoom with these three converters gives me virtually continuous coverage from 25mm out to 204mm. The only "gap" in my lens coverage is from about 150mm to 200mm, which I find to be relatively acceptable. I case I need to frame a shot in that range, I will shoot it at 150mm andthen crop the picture a bit, if need be, when I print it -- the four megapixel G2 allows me to moderately crop my pictures, if need be, without drastically affecting the detail.

I never use the Canon G2's digital lens capability, however. I stick to the optical zoom and the three converters. I have not noticed any significant difference in clarity between the shots I've made with the optical zoom and with these converters. Obviously, there will always be some barrel distortion in shots made with the wideangle converter, but as a long time teacher of photojournalism, where wideangle photography is a given, I've look at such lens "distortion" as just another way of interpreting a subject. I don't think people who look at pictures even notice the slight exaggeration of most subject matter at the edges that is a byproduct of most wideangle lenses. (If I am shooting a person with a wideangle converter, however, I take care to keep their head away from the edge to avoid facial distortion.)

All in all, my first few months of using the G2 has been quite satisfying. I enjoy printing my favorite shots in 8x10 size, and this four megapixel camera gives me plenty of resolution for such prints, and allows me to crop when I need to without much of a downside.

I have yet to use it on an extended shoot -- in July and August I will be in Alaska and on the Bering Sea for a month, and will submit the G2 and my converters to their first major test. I will be taking a photo workshop on that trip with landscape photographer Galen Rowell and wildlife photographer Franz Lanting, and I look forward to getting a lot of input from them as well. I hope to shoot about 4,000-5,000 pictures under all kinds of weather and lighting conditions, downloading the best of them to my iBook laptop as I go. I plan to write an article about what I learn about digital photography from this adventure and illustrate it with some of my favorite shots. This article will be posted at http://www.worldisround.com , where I currently have posted another article on my last extended digital shoot, a three-week trip through Southeast Asia with my three megapixel Kodak DC4800 and it's converters. This camera now provides backup to the G2 in case of any problems. (You can see this article at: http://www.worldisround.com/articles/1865/index.html in case you have not already seen it.)

Best,

Phil
Hey Phil. Long time no hear from. How do you find the G2 and
Tiffen lenses? Is the vignetting a problem with the Tiffens? How
would you rate the quality of those lenses (since you teach
photography)?
--Phil DouglisDirector, The Douglis Visual WorkshopsPhoenix, [email protected]
 
Thanks for the very informative post. I read this awhile back but forgot to post a response. I get the feeling I would have been very happy with the Tiffen set. Especially when you say the w/a does not vignette at all. As expected, when the lens is at 25mm there will be barrel distortion. Is this till noticeable when you zoom in to about 28mm? Slight or still very noticeable?
Good to hear from you, too. So far, I'm delighted with the G2 and
my Tiffen .75x and 2x converters, as well as my Canon 1.5x
converter. My lens range is not really hampered by whatever
vignetting might occur. For example, my .75x Tiffen wideangle
converter will not vignette at all. I am getting a zoom range with
it equal to a 25mm to 76mm zoom lens in 35mm equivalence.

When I reach that 76mm point and want to go a bit beyond it, I use
my the G2s own 34mm-102mm G2 lens. When I want to go longer than
100mm, I go to my Canon 1.5x medium telephoto coverter. Although
Canon advises us to use this lens only at it's full 152mm setting,
I find that I can actually zoom with it from between 100mm to
152mm. (Vignetting begins at about 100mm with this lens.)

My Tiffen 2x long telephoto converter, however, can be used only
at it's full 152mm length. If you zoom back with it to any degree,
it will begin to vignette.

Using the Canon G2's zoom with these three converters gives me
virtually continuous coverage from 25mm out to 204mm. The only
"gap" in my lens coverage is from about 150mm to 200mm, which I
find to be relatively acceptable. I case I need to frame a shot in
that range, I will shoot it at 150mm andthen crop the picture a
bit, if need be, when I print it -- the four megapixel G2 allows me
to moderately crop my pictures, if need be, without drastically
affecting the detail.

I never use the Canon G2's digital lens capability, however. I
stick to the optical zoom and the three converters. I have not
noticed any significant difference in clarity between the shots
I've made with the optical zoom and with these converters.
Obviously, there will always be some barrel distortion in shots
made with the wideangle converter, but as a long time teacher of
photojournalism, where wideangle photography is a given, I've look
at such lens "distortion" as just another way of interpreting a
subject. I don't think people who look at pictures even notice the
slight exaggeration of most subject matter at the edges that is a
byproduct of most wideangle lenses. (If I am shooting a person with
a wideangle converter, however, I take care to keep their head away
from the edge to avoid facial distortion.)

All in all, my first few months of using the G2 has been quite
satisfying. I enjoy printing my favorite shots in 8x10 size, and
this four megapixel camera gives me plenty of resolution for such
prints, and allows me to crop when I need to without much of a
downside.

I have yet to use it on an extended shoot -- in July and August I
will be in Alaska and on the Bering Sea for a month, and will
submit the G2 and my converters to their first major test. I will
be taking a photo workshop on that trip with landscape photographer
Galen Rowell and wildlife photographer Franz Lanting, and I look
forward to getting a lot of input from them as well. I hope to
shoot about 4,000-5,000 pictures under all kinds of weather and
lighting conditions, downloading the best of them to my iBook
laptop as I go. I plan to write an article about what I learn about
digital photography from this adventure and illustrate it with some
of my favorite shots. This article will be posted at
http://www.worldisround.com , where I currently have posted another article
on my last extended digital shoot, a three-week trip through
Southeast Asia with my three megapixel Kodak DC4800 and it's
converters. This camera now provides backup to the G2 in case of
any problems. (You can see this article at:
http://www.worldisround.com/articles/1865/index.html in case you
have not already seen it.)

Best,

Phil
Hey Phil. Long time no hear from. How do you find the G2 and
Tiffen lenses? Is the vignetting a problem with the Tiffens? How
would you rate the quality of those lenses (since you teach
photography)?
--
Phil Douglis
Director, The Douglis Visual Workshops
Phoenix, Arizona
[email protected]
 
Eddie,

I have to disagree with you on one small point. Most people who own a Canon SLR may not own a lens that takes a 52mm filter. Canon only makes a couple of lenses that are 52mm. Most are 58mm or more. You are correct in saying that the 50mm II lens is 52mm but you'd be surprised at how few people actually use a 50mm lens.

I own an EOS 3 and an EOS 650 (God I love that old camera) with several Canon lenses. I only own one lens that uses a 52mm filter.

I am not saying there is anything wrong with the Lensmate but I think that most people who use a Canon SLR have a Canon Speed Light and would consider the Canon adapter more advantageous than the Lensmate. One of the main reasons I purchased a G2 was because I own other Canon equipment that can be used with the G2.

Maybe I'm crazy but I'm a firm believer in "equipment matching". Canon is like all companies. They make several different photographic items that complement each other and when a person is trying to produce the best picture possible, equipment matching sometimes helps in the process.
I also use a Canon scanner and a Canon printer along with Canon pro paper.

Don't get me wrong. Other companies make products that are just as good as Canon but once a person buys a quality piece of equipment (a camera body) it is usually wise to stick with the attachments that are made for that equipment. Naturally, that's only my opinion and all of us have one of those.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top